Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saudi gang rape sentence 'unjust'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Saudi gang rape sentence 'unjust'

    A lawyer for a gang-rape victim in Saudi Arabia who was sentenced to 200 lashes and six-months in jail says the punishment contravenes Islamic law.
    The woman was initially punished for violating laws on segregation of the sexes - she was in an unrelated man's car at the time of the attack.

    When she appealed, judges doubled her sentence, saying she had been trying to use the media to influence them.

    Her lawyer has been suspended from the case and faces a disciplinary session.

    Abdel Rahman al-Lahem told the BBC Arabic Service that the sentence was in violation of Islamic law:

    "My client is the victim of this abhorrent crime. I believe her sentence contravenes the Islamic Sharia law and violates the pertinent international conventions," he said.

    "The judicial bodies should have dealt with this girl as the victim rather than the culprit."

    The lawyer also said that his client would appeal against the decision to increase her punishment.

    Segregation laws

    According to the Arab News newspaper, the 19-year-old woman, who is from Saudi Arabia's Shia minority, was gang-raped 14 times in an attack in Qatif in the eastern province a year-and-a-half ago.

    Seven men were found guilty of the rape and sentenced to prison terms ranging from just under a year to five years.

    Being a Muslim, I think it's a big injustice done to the girl. If the court doubled the sentence of the girl then they should have given death penalty to the rapists



    The rapists' sentences were also doubled by the court. Correspondents say the sentences were still low considering the rapists could have faced the death penalty.

    The rape victim was punished for violating Saudi Arabia's laws on segregation that forbid unrelated men and women from associating with each other. She was initially sentenced to 90 lashes for being in the car of a strange man.

    On appeal, the Arab News reported that the punishment was not reduced but increased to 200 lashes and a six-month prison sentence.

    'Personal views'

    Mr Lahem accused the court of letting personal views influence its decision.

    "It seems that the sentence was influenced by the fact that the woman escalated the issue with her lawyer and also with the supreme judicial authorities," he said.

    "This is astonishing because justice is supposed to be independent from all pressures as well as personal considerations, be it a feeling towards the lawyer or defendant herself," he added.

    The Arab News quoted an official as saying the judges had decided to punish the girl for trying to aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media.

    Mr Lahem said that the judges' decision to confiscate his license to work and stop him from representing his client is illegal.


  • #2
    Court to review sentence

    A Saudi court will review the case of a teenage gang rape victim sentenced to jail and flogging after she was convicted of violating the country's strict sex segregation laws, the foreign minister said Tuesday.

    The remarks by Prince Saud al-Faisal, made in the United States and carried by the official Saudi Press Agency, were the latest in response to a salvo of international condemnation of Saudi judicial authorities' handling of the case.

    It was also a sharp turn from a statement Saturday in which the Saudi Justice Ministry condemned the 19-year-old woman as an adulteress who had allegedly confessed to cheating on her husband. She was raped by seven men and then sentenced to six months prison and 200 lashes.

    In the statement, the ministry said the flogging sentence would be carried out and condemned foreign interference. The statement likely sought to ease international outrage over the case by discrediting the woman.

    On Tuesday, SPA quoted al-Faisal as saying "the Saudi judiciary will review the case."

    But al-Faisal was also on the defensive and maintained the case was being used against Saudi authorities.

    "What is outraging about this case is that it is being used against the Saudi government and people," he said, speaking in Annapolis, Maryland, where he was attending the U.S.-hosted Mideast peace conference.
    Known only as the "Girl from Qatif," the victim said she was a newlywed who was meeting a high school friend in his car to retrieve a picture of herself from him when the attack occurred in the eastern city of Qatif in 2006.

    While she was in the car, two men got into the vehicle and drove them to a secluded area where others waited, and then she was raped.

    The ministry's account Saturday alleged that the woman and her lover met in his car for a tryst "in a dark place where they stayed for a while."

    The girl was initially sentenced to prison and 90 lashes for being alone with a man not related to her. An appeals court then doubled the lashes to 200.

    The increase in sentence received heavy coverage in the international media and prompted expressions of astonishment from the U.S. government. Canada called it "barbaric."

    Under Saudi Arabia's strict interpretation of Islamic Sharia law, women are not allowed in public in the company of men other than their male relatives. Also, women in Saudi Arabia are often sentenced to flogging and even death for adultery and other crimes.

    The seven men convicted of gang raping the woman were given prison sentences of two to nine years.

    The case has sparked rare domestic debate about the Saudi legal system, which gives judges wide discretion in sentencing and where rules of evidence are shaky and sometimes no lawyers are present.

    Justice in Saudi Arabia is administered by a system of religious courts and judges appointed by the king on the recommendation of the Supreme Judicial Council. Those courts and judges have complete discretion to set sentences, except in cases where Sharia outlines a punishment, such as capital crimes.

    That means that no two judges would likely hand down the same sentence for similar crimes. A rapist, for instance, could receive anywhere from a light or no sentence to death, depending on the judge's discretion.

    Comment

    Working...
    X