Citizenship

[Rasputin]

Citizenship is membership in a political community (originally a city but now usually a state) and carries with it rights to political participation; a person having such membership is a citizen. It is largely coterminous with nationality, although it is possible to have a nationality without being a citizen (i.e., be legally subject to a state and entitled to its protection without having rights of political participation in it); it is also possible to have political rights without being a national of a state; for example, a citizen of a Commonwealth country resident in the United Kingdom is entitled to full political rights.

See nationality for further discussion of the properties of national citizenship and how it can be acquired.

Citizenship often also implies working towards the betterment of one's community through participation, volunteer work, and efforts to improve life for all citizens. In this vein, schools in England provide lessons in citizenship; in Wales the model used is Personal and Social Education.

Citizenship as explained above is the political rights of an individual within a society. Thus, you can have a citizenship from one country and be a national of another country. One example might be as follows: A Cuban-American might be considered a national of Cuba due to his being born there, but he could also become an American citizen through naturalization. Some countries like Cuba and the United States of America forbid dual citizenship in the other country because of political tensions between the two nations. Nationality most often derives from place of birth (i.e. jus soli) and, in some cases, ethnicity (i.e. jus sanguinis). Citizenship derives from a legal relationship with a state. Nationality can be lost, as in denaturalization, and gained, as in naturalization.

In recent years, some intergovernmental organisations have extended the concept and terminology associated with citizenship to the international level, where it is applied to the totality of the citizens of their constituent countries combined. Two examples are given below, of citizenship in the European Union, and also of citizenship within the Commonwealth of Nations. As of 2005, citizenship at this level is a secondary concept, with a weaker status than national citizenship.

The ultimate version of supranational citizenship would be some sort of global citizenship; the United Nations does not represent this concept directly, however, being more of an international forum than a structure for expressing individual rights and responsibilities.

[Rasputin]

European Union (EU) citizenship
The Maastricht Treaty introduced the concept of citizenship of the European Union. This citizenship flows from national citizenship — one holds the nationality of an EU member state and as a result becomes a "citizen of the Union" in addition.

EU citizenship offers certain rights and privileges within the EU; in many areas EU citizens have the same or similar rights as native citizens in member states. Such rights granted to EU citizens include:

freedom of movement and the right of residence within the territory of the Member States;
right to vote and stand as a candidate at elections to the European Parliament and at municipal elections in the Member State of residence;
right to diplomatic and consular protection;
right of petition to the European Parliament; and
right to refer to the Ombudsman.
The right of residence connotes not only the right of abode, but also the right to apply to work in any position (including national civil services with the exception of sensitive positions such as defence).

EU member states also use a common passport design, burgundy coloured, with the name of the member state, national seal, and the title "European Union" (or its translation), and most also use a common format for their driving licences in order to simplify their use within the whole EU.

Union citizenship continues to gain in status and the European Court of Justice has stated that Union citizenship will be the "fundamental status of nationals of Member States" (see Case C-184/99 Rudy Grzelczyk v Centre Public d'Aide Sociale d'Ottignes-Louvain-la-Neuve, [2001] ECR I-6193, para 31). The European Commission has affirmed that Union citizenship should be the fundamental status of EU nationals, but this is not accepted by many of the member states of the European Union.

The concept of "Commonwealth Citizenship" has been in place ever since the establishment of the Commonwealth of Nations. As with the EU, one holds Commonwealth citizenship only by being a citizen of a Commonwealth member state. This form of citizenship offers certain privileges within some Commonwealth countries:

Some such countries do not require tourist visas of citizens of other Commonwealth countries.
In some Commonwealth countries resident citizens of other Commonwealth countries are entitled to political rights, e.g., the right to vote in local and national elections and in some cases even the right to stand for election.
In some instances the right to work in any position (including the civil service) is granted, except for certain specific positions (e.g. defence, Governor-General or President, Prime Minister).
Whilst Commonwealth citizenship is sometimes enshrined in the written constitutions (where applicable) of Commonwealth states and is considered by some to be a form of dual citizenship, there have never been, nor are there any plans for a common passport.

Although the Republic of Ireland left the Commonwealth in 1949, it is often treated as if it were a member, with references being made in legal documents to 'the Commonwealth and the Republic of Ireland', and its citizens are not classified as foreign nationals, particularly in the United Kingdom.

Canada departed from the principle of nationality being defined in terms of allegiance in 1921 (Nationals Act 1921 (Canada)), in an attempt to prevent non-Canadians (especially of Asian origin) from entering Canada. In 1935 the Irish Free State was the first to introduce its own citizenship (However, Irish citizens were still treated as subjects of the Crown, and they are still not regarded as foreign, even though Ireland is not a member of the Commonwealth; Murray v Parkes [1942] All ER 123).

In 1946 the Canadian Citizenship Act destroyed the common basis for citizenship. The concept of Commonwealth citizenship was introduced in 1948 in the British Nationality Act 1948. Other Dominions adopted this principle, in New Zealand, in the British Nationality and New Zealand Citizenship Act 1948. Citizenship has replaced allegiance, a more than symbolic change. Yet, at the same time, Canada continued to stress the continued allegiance of Canadians to a common Crown. It was just that practical requirements meant that national status had to be based on something other than allegiance, or peoples from throughout the Commonwealth might choose to settle in Canada.

[Rasputin]

Citizenship most usually relates to membership of the nation state, but the term can also apply at subnational level. Subnational entities may impose requirements, of residency or otherwise, which permit citizens to participate in the political life of that entity, or to enjoy benefits provided by the government of that entity. But in such cases, those eligible are also sometimes seen as "citizens" of the relevant state, province, or region. An example of this is how the fundamental basis of Swiss citizenship is citizenship of an individual commune, and thus of a canton and of the Confederation.

Some countries extend "honorary citizenship" to those whom they consider to be especially admirable or worthy of the distinction.

By Act of Congress and presidential assent, honorary United States citizenship has been awarded to only six individuals.

The only people to ever receive Honorary Canadian citizenship are Raoul Wallenberg posthumously in 1985, Nelson Mandela in 2001 and the 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso on June 22, 2006.

In 2002 South Korea awarded honorary citizenship to Dutch football (soccer) coach Guus Hiddink who successfully and unexpectedly took the national team to the semi-finals of the 2002 FIFA World Cup.

American actress Angelina Jolie received an honorary Cambodian citizenship in 2005 due to her humanitarian efforts.

Historically, many states limited citizenship to only a proportion of their population, thereby creating a citizen class with political rights superior to other sections of the population, but equal with each other. The classical example of a limited citizenry was Athens where slaves, women, and resident foreigners (called metics) were excluded from political rights. The Roman Republic forms another example, and, more recently, the szlachta of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth had some of the same characteristics.

[donsaeid]

تكليف تابعيت فرزندان حاصل از ازدواج زنان ايراني با مردان خارجي مشخص شد

مجلس شوراي اسلامي تكليف تابعيت فرزندان حاصل از ازدواج زنان ايراني با مردان خارجي را بررسي و مشخص كرد.


در جلسه علني امروز يكشنبه خود با بررسي طرح فوريتي تعيين تكليف تابعيت فرزندان حاصل از ازدواج زنان ايراني با مردان خارجي مصوب كردند كه فرزندان حاصل از ازدواج زنان ايراني با مردان خارجي كه در ايران متولد شده يا حداكثر تا يكسال پس از تصويب اين قانون در ايران متولد ميشوند، ميتوانند بعد از رسيدن به سن هجده سال تمام، تقاضاي تابعيت ايراني نمايند.
اين افراد در صورت نداشتن سوء پيشينه كيفري يا امنيتي و اعلام رد تابعيت غير ايراني به تابعيت ايران پذيرفته ميشوند.
همچنين براساس اين مصوبه وزارت كشور نسبت به احراز ولادت طفل در ايران و صدور پروانه ازدواج موضوع ماده (1060) قانون مدني اقدام مينمايد و نيروي انتظامي نيز با اعلام وزارت كشور پروانه اقامت براي پدر خارجي مذكور در اين ماده صادر ميكند. فرزندان موضوع اين ماده قبل از تحصيل تابعيت نيز مجاز به اقامت در ايران ميباشند.
براساس اين مصوبه چنانچه سن مشمولين ماده در زمان تصويب بيش از هجده سال تمام باشد بايستي حداكثر ظرف يكسال اقدام به تقاضاي تابعيت ايراني نمايند.
نمايندگان همچنين مصوب كردند: از تاريخ تصويب اين قانون كساني كه در اثر ازدواج زن ايراني و مرد خارجي در ايران متولد شدند و ازدواج والدين آنان از ابتدا با رعايت ماده (1060) قانون مدني به ثبت رسيده باشد، پس از رسيدن به سن 18 سال تمام و حداكثر ظرف مدت يكسال، بدون رعايت شرط سكونت مندرج در ماده 979 قانون مدني به تابعيت ايراني پذيرفته ميشوند.
حسن كامران نماينده اصفهان در موافقت با كليات اين طرح وجود فرزندان بدون هويت را بحثي جدي خواند و گفت: تعدادي از اتباع خارجي در ايران ايران ازدواج كردهاند كه داراي فرزنداني شدهاند و بايد اين مشكل حل شود.
عباسعلي اختري نماينده تهران نيز در مخالفت با كليات اين طرح اظهار داشت: ما نبايد براي حل مشكل كساني كه از مادر ايراني و از پدر غير ايراني متولد شدهاند يك مشكل گسترده ديگر را فراهم كنيم.
وي با اشاره به اينكه افرادي در منطقه شرق كشور با اهداف سياسي وارد كشور شدهاند، تصريح كرد: كساني كه اشرافي بر خط، فكر و اعتقاد و ارتباط آنها با خارج كشور نداريم چنانچه تابعيت ايراني بگيرند چه پيامدهايي خواهد داشت.
وي گفت: بدون ترديد فرزندان تحت تاثير افكار پدران قرار ميگيرند و در بسياري موارد مباني حكومتي و مباني عقيدتي ما را قبول ندارند. لذا به جاي تابعيت بايد به اين افراد مجوز اقامت داده شود.
اختري تصريح كرد: شما با تصويب اين قانون به كساني تابعيت ميدهيد كه نميدانيد چه ميكنند لذا راي دادن به چنين طرح و تصويب تابعيت به صلاح كشور نيست.
در ادامه محمد دهقان نماينده چناران و طرقبه در موافقت با كليات اين طرح اظهار داشت: بر روي اين طرح كار پخته همه جانبه انجام گرفته است، بالاخره تعدادي از مردان كشورهاي همسايه به كشور ما آمدند و با زنان ايراني ازدواج كردهاند و برخي از آنها بچهدار شدهاند و الان زنان ايراني با فرزندان خود در ايران هستند و زندگي ميكنند.
وي با اشاره به اين كه تعدادي از مردان خارجي به كشورهاي خود بازگشته و يا فوت شدهاند، خاطرنشان كرد: بالاخره هويت اين فرزندان بايد مشخص شود، چون بيشترين بزهكاري و جرم ازطرف كساني است كه هويت ندارند.
دهقان با بيان اين كه در اين طرح تمهيدات خاصي ديده شده است، گفت: در اين طرح آمده كساني كه متولد ايران هستند، چنانچه به سن 18 سالگي برسند ميتوانند درخواست تابعيت ايراني بدهند و تا قبل از آن ميتوانند با كارت اقامت از امكانات آموزشي برخوردار باشند.
وي افزود: تجربه نشان داده بيش از 96 درصد اينگونه افراد به كشور پدر خود بازنگشتند، لذا بايد تكليف اين افراد مشخص شود.
رفعت بيات نماينده زنجان در مخالفت با اين طرح گفت:چون بحث 18 سالگي در اين قانون آمده است تكليف افراد زير 18 سال مشخص نشده است و معلوم نيست اين افراد چه ميشوند، لذا پيشنهاد ميكنيم اين سن حذف و تابعيت ايراني به اين افراد نيز داده شود.
محمد رضا مير تاج الديني نماينده تبريز در موافقت با كليات اين طرح اظهار داشت: در اين قانون بطور شفاف بررسيها صورت گرفته است و بالاخره بايد تكليف بچههايي كه در اين زمينه هيچگونه تقصيري نداشتهاند مشخص شود.
وي گفت: ما نميتوانيم اين بچهها را به حال خود رها كنيم.
در ادامه بحث كفايت مذاكرات از طرف نمايندگان ملاير مطرح شد كه به تصويب نمايندگان رسيد و سپس نمايندگان در راي گيري با كليات اين طرح با 153 راي موافق، 21 راي مخالف و 18 راي ممتنع از 208 نماينده حاضر موافقت كردند.
سپس نمايندگان وارد بررسي جزئيات اين طرح شدند كه جزئيات ماده واحده نيز با 124 راي موافق و 9 راي ممتنع از مجموع 215 نماينده حاضر به تصويب رسيد.

[aliansari10]

YES SSSS