Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NAzarehtoon beh in article bedin

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NAzarehtoon beh in article bedin

    SCOTT RITTER SAYS U.S. PLANS JUNE ATTACK ON IRAN, COOKED JAN. 30 IRAQI
    ELECTION RESULTS

    By Mark Jensen

    United for Peace of Pierce County (WA)
    February 19, 2005

    Scott Ritter, appearing with journalist Dahr Jamail yesterday in Washington State,
    dropped two shocking bombshells in a talk delivered to a packed house in Olympia's
    Capitol Theater. The ex-Marine turned UNSCOM weapons inspector said that George W.
    Bush has "signed off" on plans to bomb Iran in June 2005, and claimed the U.S.
    manipulated the results of the recent Jan. 30 elections in Iraq.

    Olympians like to call the Capitol Theater "historic," but it's doubtful whether the eighty-
    year-old edifice has ever been the scene of more portentous revelations.

    The principal theme of Scott Ritter's talk was Americans duty to protect the U.S.
    Constitution by taking action to bring an end to the illegal war in Iraq. But in passing, the
    former UNSCOM weapons inspector stunned his listeners with two pronouncements.
    Ritter said plans for a June attack on Iran have been submitted to President George W.
    Bush, and that the president has approved them. He also asserted that knowledgeable
    sources say U.S. officials "cooked" the results of the Jan. 30 elections in Iraq.

    On Iran, Ritter said that President George W. Bush has received and signed off on orders
    for an aerial attack on Iran planned for June 2005. Its purported goal is the destruction
    of Iran's alleged program to develop nuclear weapons, but Ritter said neoconservatives
    in the administration also expected that the attack would set in motion a chain of events
    leading to regime change in the oil-rich nation of 70 million -- a possibility Ritter regards
    with the greatest skepticism.

    The former Marine also said that the Jan. 30 elections, which George W. Bush has
    called "a turning point in the history of Iraq, a milestone in the advance of freedom,"
    were not so free after all. Ritter said that U.S. authorities in Iraq had manipulated the
    results in order to reduce the percentage of the vote received by the United Iraqi Alliance
    from 56% to 48%.

    Asked by UFPPC's Ted Nation about this shocker, Ritter said an official involved in the
    manipulation was the source, and that this would soon be reported by a Pulitzer Prize-
    winning journalist in a major metropolitan magazine -- an obvious allusion to New Yorker
    reporter Seymour M. Hersh.

    On Jan. 17, the New Yorker posted an article by Hersh entitled The Coming Wars (New
    Yorker, January 24-31, 2005). In it, the well-known investigative journalist claimed that
    for the Bush administration, "The next strategic target [is] Iran." Hersh also reported
    that "The Administration has been conducting secret reconnaissance missions inside Iran
    at least since last summer." According to Hersh, "Defense Department civilians, under
    the leadership of Douglas Feith, have been working with Israeli planners and consultants
    to develop and refine potential nuclear, chemical-weapons, and missile targets inside
    Iran. . . . Strategists at the headquarters of the U.S. Central Command, in Tampa,
    Florida, have been asked to revise the military's war plan, providing for a maximum
    ground and air invasion of Iran. . . . The hawks in the Administration believe that it will
    soon become clear that the Europeans negotiated approach [to Iran] cannot succeed,
    and that at that time the Administration will act."

    Scott Ritter said that although the peace movement failed to stop the war in Iraq, it had a
    chance to stop the expansion of the war to other nations like Iran and Syria. He held up
    the specter of a day when the Iraq war might be remembered as a relatively minor
    event that preceded an even greater conflagration.

    Scott Ritter's talk was the culmination of a long evening devoted to discussion of Iraq and
    U.S. foreign policy. Before Ritter spoke, Dahr Jamail narrated a slide show on Iraq
    focusing on Fallujah. He showed more than a hundred vivid photographs taken in Iraq,
    mostly by himself. Many of them showed the horrific slaughter of civilians.

    Dahr Jamail argued that U.S. mainstream media sources are complicit in the war and
    help sustain support for it by deliberately downplaying the truth about the devastation
    and death it is causing.

    Jamail was, until recently, one of the few unembedded journalists in Iraq and one of the
    only independent ones. His reports have gained a substantial following and are available
    online at dahrjamailiraq.com.

    Friday evening's event in Olympia was sponsored by South Puget Sound Community
    College's Student Activities Board, Veterans for Peace, 100 Thousand and Counting,
    Olympia Movement for Justice & Peace, and United for Peace of Pierce County.


    What do u think guys?

  • #2
    hmm bedone khondan ham mishe nazar dad??

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Cop
      hmm bedone khondan ham mishe nazar dad??
      ehh behkhunesh tambal!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Man ehsas mikonam ke US dare dekhaalat hayee mikone ke aslan beesh marbootee nadaaran, va dar baareye Nuclear weapons man fek mikonam ke Iran in kaaro nemikone agaram ke daare mikone in azadiro daare...age Iran nabayad daashte baashe pas chera israel america mitavaanan daashte baashan...Bush khodashraa karde yek dictator valee na baraye mamlekatesh baraye tamaame donya...YEK OMRE AMERICA SHODA FOZOOLE DONYA MAN FEK MIKONAM FAKHDESHE IRAN BEZANATESH ZAMIN......CHON AMERICA VASAT HAST MAN GHOLAME AAKHOONDAA HASTAM

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Sahar-Vatan_Parast
          Man ehsas mikonam ke US dare dekhaalat hayee mikone ke aslan beesh marbootee nadaaran

          Mage joz in kare dige ham karde ta hala

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Sahar-Vatan_Parast
            Man ehsas mikonam ke US dare dekhaalat hayee mikone ke aslan beesh marbootee nadaaran, va dar baareye Nuclear weapons man fek mikonam ke Iran in kaaro nemikone agaram ke daare mikone in azadiro daare...age Iran nabayad daashte baashe pas chera israel america mitavaanan daashte baashan...Bush khodashraa karde yek dictator valee na baraye mamlekatesh baraye tamaame donya...YEK OMRE AMERICA SHODA FOZOOLE DONYA MAN FEK MIKONAM FAKHDESHE IRAN BEZANATESH ZAMIN......CHON AMERICA VASAT HAST MAN GHOLAME AAKHOONDAA HASTAM
            there are so many resons why iran shouldnt have a nuclear wepon and thats not just because i live in the US.
            your saying why can USA, Israel britan, all these other counties have a nucke well because those are stable countries, its people arnt waiting for a revolution in there countrie nor are those countries being ran by dictatores. there is a diffrance between a hard liner like bush and sharon and a dictator.

            also if iran has a nuke it will star an arms race in the middle east which is very dangerouse.

            also by now if you have anlysed what i wrot you should be saying what about north korea which is a dictatorship and is unstable well see how the world has isolated that country[/i]

            Comment


            • #7
              well if they do get them then no one will ever mess with iran again.. and that is a good thing...and the USA is acting liekan impiralist dictator dictating to other cuntries what they can and cannot have... baba beh USA cheh ehhh...besides they are violating the soverignty of other countries includign IRan by dekhlating in toh karashoon...

              Comment

              Working...
              X