Ground rules in relationships are standards or guidelines of conduct that partners in close relationships agree to follow in order to minimize conflict.
Although people sometimes dislike the concept of rules for relationships, ground rules benefit relationship partners analogous to the way rules of the road benefit drivers. Ground rules allow relationship partners to coordinate their behaviors so they achieve shared goals with fewer conflicts. Some ground rules are universal in the sense they apply to virtually all relationships in a particular culture. Other ground rules apply to specific kinds of relationships, such as friendships or marriages. Still other ground rules are designed to manage romantic rivalry and jealousy. The ground rules adopted by sexually monogamous couples tend to prohibit behaviors that are viewed as acts of infidelity. The ground rules adopted by sexually open couples tend to prohibit behaviors that provoke jealousy. Partners may change the ground rules of their relationships over time.
People sometimes dislike the concept of rules in relationships. Rules are restrictive. Placing too many restrictions on personal relationships undermine individual freedom, threatening to smother individual identity and individual happiness. Individuals may feel suffocated by too many restrictions in their relationship.
Yet, relationship rules have clear benefits when used in moderation. The ground rules of relationships serve a function analogous to the rules of the road. [1] The rules of the road allow drivers to easily coordinate their behaviors so they can reach their destinations with fewer collisions. Ground rules similarly allow partners to easily coordinate their behaviors to achieve shared goals with fewer conflicts.
Argyle and colleagues have conducted studies indicating the existence of rules that apply to all relationships. For example, Argyle, Graham, Campbell, and White collected 124 possible rules for 25 different situations in a pilot study, then carried out a formal study to see if people endorsed some rules as applying to all situations. [2] The participants in their study did endorse some rules in all situations. These included rules such as "be polite" and "do not embarass others." In a subsequent study, Argyle, Henderson, Bond, Iizuka, and Contarello asked people to rate how strongly each of 40 or so rules applied to 22 different relationships. [3] For each relationship, the 40 or so rules consisted of 33 rules theorized to be universal rules and 5-10 rules theorized to be specific to that particular relationship. The following rules were widely endorsed as applying to all types of relationships:
seek to repay debts, favours or compliments, no matter how small
be emotionally supportive
respect the other's privacy
keep confidences
share news of success with the other person
do not criticize the other person in public
stand up for the other person in their absence
look the other person in the eye during conversation
address the other by their first name
do not engage in sexual activity with the other
The findings from these studies indicate that some relationship rules apply to all situations and all relationships. It is important to point out that relationship rules may be "universal" only within specific cultures or specific historical periods. When Argyle and colleagues looked at the same relationship rules in Hong Kong, Japan, and Italy, they observed cultural differences. For example, people from Hong Kong placed greater emphasis on respecting privacy, while people in Japan placed less emphasis on standing up for others in their absence. Relationship rules may be universal only in the sense that they apply to virtually all relationships within a given culture for a given historical period.
Although people sometimes dislike the concept of rules for relationships, ground rules benefit relationship partners analogous to the way rules of the road benefit drivers. Ground rules allow relationship partners to coordinate their behaviors so they achieve shared goals with fewer conflicts. Some ground rules are universal in the sense they apply to virtually all relationships in a particular culture. Other ground rules apply to specific kinds of relationships, such as friendships or marriages. Still other ground rules are designed to manage romantic rivalry and jealousy. The ground rules adopted by sexually monogamous couples tend to prohibit behaviors that are viewed as acts of infidelity. The ground rules adopted by sexually open couples tend to prohibit behaviors that provoke jealousy. Partners may change the ground rules of their relationships over time.
People sometimes dislike the concept of rules in relationships. Rules are restrictive. Placing too many restrictions on personal relationships undermine individual freedom, threatening to smother individual identity and individual happiness. Individuals may feel suffocated by too many restrictions in their relationship.
Yet, relationship rules have clear benefits when used in moderation. The ground rules of relationships serve a function analogous to the rules of the road. [1] The rules of the road allow drivers to easily coordinate their behaviors so they can reach their destinations with fewer collisions. Ground rules similarly allow partners to easily coordinate their behaviors to achieve shared goals with fewer conflicts.
Argyle and colleagues have conducted studies indicating the existence of rules that apply to all relationships. For example, Argyle, Graham, Campbell, and White collected 124 possible rules for 25 different situations in a pilot study, then carried out a formal study to see if people endorsed some rules as applying to all situations. [2] The participants in their study did endorse some rules in all situations. These included rules such as "be polite" and "do not embarass others." In a subsequent study, Argyle, Henderson, Bond, Iizuka, and Contarello asked people to rate how strongly each of 40 or so rules applied to 22 different relationships. [3] For each relationship, the 40 or so rules consisted of 33 rules theorized to be universal rules and 5-10 rules theorized to be specific to that particular relationship. The following rules were widely endorsed as applying to all types of relationships:
seek to repay debts, favours or compliments, no matter how small
be emotionally supportive
respect the other's privacy
keep confidences
share news of success with the other person
do not criticize the other person in public
stand up for the other person in their absence
look the other person in the eye during conversation
address the other by their first name
do not engage in sexual activity with the other
The findings from these studies indicate that some relationship rules apply to all situations and all relationships. It is important to point out that relationship rules may be "universal" only within specific cultures or specific historical periods. When Argyle and colleagues looked at the same relationship rules in Hong Kong, Japan, and Italy, they observed cultural differences. For example, people from Hong Kong placed greater emphasis on respecting privacy, while people in Japan placed less emphasis on standing up for others in their absence. Relationship rules may be universal only in the sense that they apply to virtually all relationships within a given culture for a given historical period.


Comment