American Teacher charged with rape in the US

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rasputin
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2005
    • 63906

    #1

    American Teacher charged with rape in the US

    A MARRIED teacher has been charged with seven counts of statutory rape after allegedly having sex with a 13-year-old schoolboy more than 300 times - including right under her husband's nose.

    Police say Christine McCallum, 29, lived a disturbed double life for almost two years.

    The Boston teacher is accused of having serial liaisons with the boy in Rockland and Abington from February 2006, when she allegedly took his virginity, to November 2007.

    The boy told police they had sex for the first time on a couch at McCallum's home while her husband slept upstairs.

    They also had unprotected sex in the shower, on the kitchen floor and on the living room floor, court documents say.

    The Boston Herald reports that McCallum denies all the allegations, saying she took the boy and his brother in.

    "She tried to mother the child because she felt sorry for them," her lawyer Frederick McDermott said.

    Prosecutors claim McCallum weaved her way into the boy’s life in late 2005 when she became a tutor for his younger brother.

    But within months she was allegedly giving them vodka and rum - and sleeping with him in her house.

    Police said McCallum ended the relationship in a fit of jealousy when she discovered the boy was using a mobile phone she bought him to text other girls.

    The alleged affair was uncovered last week when a friend of the boy told his mother.

    iran
  • DokhtarIrooni
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2006
    • 2347

    #2
    Its not exactly rape when they had a relationship. But its still gross
    ~ Bahar ~

    Comment

    • Nutcase
      Member
      • Jan 2006
      • 830

      #3
      Depending on where in the world one lives, as far as north america is concerned it is statutory rape when the victim is below 18, even if it was consentual, the adult here is taking advantage of the innocence of a minor who cannot make a rational descision concerning sex, eitherway this sounds like another Mary Kay Letourneau case, google her name and you will know what i am talking about.

      Comment

      Working...