Originally posted by Leigha
View Post
first you definately jumped into conclusions about me. about your argument, you would have to define oppression. the US is a actually textbook oppressive and repressive. Repression means you do not *feel* free to do what you want to do and be yourself. you have to think about this hard to verify it. you might think the US has "freedom", but it is a very narrow definition of freedom. Canada is much freer, the people more freaky AND healthy, and there is very little porn production in comparison. same with europe.
also, you don't differentiate the HUGE difference between (1) being freaky or "grotesque", and (2) going on tape being freaky as your day job. I also accept that taping things, and even making it available in the fringes of society might be legitimate to some extent (like they do in non-anglo europe). About it being a "phase", first you have to appreciate that human beings don't always have a set "nature", they change often. Second, its clear that there are degrees of porn that may fit or not fit in human nature. the US is about excession. Its about obesity, addiction, etc. Its about going beyond what human nature is made for. So I'm against the extent of it if anything.
Last, about whether it is a phase etc, there is a clear test. We have to understand the full list of causes of porn. We have to look at the childhood experiences of people who do porn, their beliefs, and their culture. Then, once we've done this, we look at if their childhood, cultures, beliefs were different, and especially if they were "better", would they still have gone and done porn. Only if the answer to this complex question is yes can you say its "human nature".

Leigha

Comment