Trapping Iran
Israel knows that Iran is trapped because it has to support Hezbollah
I am somewhat surprised by the number of people who without any hesitation accept the media reports that Iran and Syria are behind all of this. I suppose to find an answer to this you really have to see who will benefit? Yes there is no denying that Iran founded, funds and backs Hezbollah. However Iran’s track record since the revolution shows that far from taking risks they have always took calculated actions.
But what would Iran gain from this? The nuclear file is under the shadow of the UNSC and Iran knows that the more its image becomes hostile in the West, the less it can bargain when it comes to negotiating. It cannot push the Chinese and the Russians given that they are the only things standing between Iran and full force of the UNCS. The current climate is totally bad for Iran because it will make it more likely for Iran to get slapped with sanctions. This would have been fairly obvious to see and now Iran has already suffered from this, whether in fact it was behind this or not.
Iran also knows that it cannot do anything to Israel now. Not directly and not indirectly. The best Hezbollah can do is to send a few unguided rockets and see where it goes, most of which either end up at sea or somewhere totally irrelevant. Perhaps in the process they might kill the odd people here and there, but it wouldn’t even dent the IDF. And directly Iran would not even dream of picking a fight with Israel, because the USA will sure as hell thrash Iran.
There was also no risk of Israel attacking Iran. Despite all the rhetoric, there was an “observed” rule that when it came to Iran, Israel would not take the initiative and any attack would certainly come from US. In fact during the early parts of last year when there was a heated debate on a pre-emptive strike on Iran (the period immediately before and after Seymour Hersh’s article) Israel went to lengths to indirectly say that they would not attack Iran.
In fact there was an ironic twist when in response to a reporter asking an Israeli commander if he was worried about Iran giving an A-bomb to Hezbollah, he said “we said they are dangerous, but we never said they are irresponsible”. So it was safe to say that Iran was pretty safe from an Israeli pre-emptive strike.
There is also an argument going around that Iran has done this to increase its influence. I think even a retarded mule could foresee that this would not work. Iran knew that just when the oil money is overflowing their pockets, the Arabs are more worried about shipping their Ferrari’s for the weekend ride in Hyde Park than get involved with something like this. All indications were that the Arabs were finally ready to just “accept” Israel existed and move on.
On the other hand, if Israel could deal with Hezbollah, then they would deal with them back in the 80 and 90 when they had a much more alert and combat trained army. In fact the experience of the US in Iraq and Afghanistan has also proved this. That a big army doesn’t necessary mean being able to win a fight with a guerrilla group. Israel withdrew from Lebanon after 20 years because it found out it could do anything to Hezbollah. This hasn’t changed which is why Israel is now hitting airports and highways which have nothing to do with Hezbollah.
Israel knows that short of a land invasion (which didn’t work in the past anyway) they really can’t touch the Hezbollah so they are pounding Beirut hoping to turn the public opinion against Hezbollah. There are report that the Israelis are also dropping propaganda leaflets on Beirut. And it is working.
People in Lebanon now see themselves as victims of Hezbollah’s unprovoked adventurism and support has gone down and not up. I think that the Iranian command knew that this would happen and I really don’t think they would unleash Hezbollah on Israel knowing that it was obvious there would be a regional backlash. Iran has had a much better track record than to come out with a blunder like this.
So thus far Iran will have gained nothing by this, and in fact a lot to loose. There is only one final possibly as to why ‘Iran’ could have initiated this. Lets suppose they initially needed the time to respond to the nuclear package because they were close to finishing off the bomb. Then when it looked that G8 was hell bent on getting a response by July 15th, Iran let Hezbollah loose on Israel to buy off the time to finish the bomb.
Well, I think this is more fiction that fact. The shortest intelligence on Iran’s timeline to the bomb is two year and this was before they found out the UF6 enriched at Natanz was probably stuff bought from China some years ago. Also there are many indications that Iran actually doesn’t want to have the bomb yet, it just wants to have the capability. There is a fine line and Iran doesn’t want to cross it on purpose.
There have been reports during the recent years that also in both aviation and missile industries, Iran has actually “restrained” its efforts instead of going full throttle. This is again not to provoke the Americans. Moreover, a bomb is not going to do anything for Iran. It will take years for the warhead delivery system of the bomb to be reliable and accurate enough for it to be a “threat” to anyone.
So if Iran launched a crude-untested warhead it would be suicide because if would be levelled to the ground by the US submarines in the Persian gulf before they even found out if the missile went anywhere or just ran out of puff mid air. What people forget is that one single bomb, doesn’t make you a threat to anyone, to be a nuclear threat, you need to have many bombs and a reliable means of delivering them to where you want, else you just might end up doing the enemy a favour and taking out yourself.
Where am I going with this? I think that no matter how adventurous, the Iranian leadership must have known that this would be a mess and it would backfire on them. It just doesn’t have anything for Iran. There would have been no scenario that Iran would come out the winner, especially because the Hezbollah capture was a week after the Hamas one and so Iran already knew by that stage that Olmert wasn’t in the mood for talking. I just find it hard to believe Iran set this up.
Israel knows that Iran is trapped because it has to support Hezbollah
I am somewhat surprised by the number of people who without any hesitation accept the media reports that Iran and Syria are behind all of this. I suppose to find an answer to this you really have to see who will benefit? Yes there is no denying that Iran founded, funds and backs Hezbollah. However Iran’s track record since the revolution shows that far from taking risks they have always took calculated actions.
But what would Iran gain from this? The nuclear file is under the shadow of the UNSC and Iran knows that the more its image becomes hostile in the West, the less it can bargain when it comes to negotiating. It cannot push the Chinese and the Russians given that they are the only things standing between Iran and full force of the UNCS. The current climate is totally bad for Iran because it will make it more likely for Iran to get slapped with sanctions. This would have been fairly obvious to see and now Iran has already suffered from this, whether in fact it was behind this or not.
Iran also knows that it cannot do anything to Israel now. Not directly and not indirectly. The best Hezbollah can do is to send a few unguided rockets and see where it goes, most of which either end up at sea or somewhere totally irrelevant. Perhaps in the process they might kill the odd people here and there, but it wouldn’t even dent the IDF. And directly Iran would not even dream of picking a fight with Israel, because the USA will sure as hell thrash Iran.
There was also no risk of Israel attacking Iran. Despite all the rhetoric, there was an “observed” rule that when it came to Iran, Israel would not take the initiative and any attack would certainly come from US. In fact during the early parts of last year when there was a heated debate on a pre-emptive strike on Iran (the period immediately before and after Seymour Hersh’s article) Israel went to lengths to indirectly say that they would not attack Iran.
In fact there was an ironic twist when in response to a reporter asking an Israeli commander if he was worried about Iran giving an A-bomb to Hezbollah, he said “we said they are dangerous, but we never said they are irresponsible”. So it was safe to say that Iran was pretty safe from an Israeli pre-emptive strike.
There is also an argument going around that Iran has done this to increase its influence. I think even a retarded mule could foresee that this would not work. Iran knew that just when the oil money is overflowing their pockets, the Arabs are more worried about shipping their Ferrari’s for the weekend ride in Hyde Park than get involved with something like this. All indications were that the Arabs were finally ready to just “accept” Israel existed and move on.
On the other hand, if Israel could deal with Hezbollah, then they would deal with them back in the 80 and 90 when they had a much more alert and combat trained army. In fact the experience of the US in Iraq and Afghanistan has also proved this. That a big army doesn’t necessary mean being able to win a fight with a guerrilla group. Israel withdrew from Lebanon after 20 years because it found out it could do anything to Hezbollah. This hasn’t changed which is why Israel is now hitting airports and highways which have nothing to do with Hezbollah.
Israel knows that short of a land invasion (which didn’t work in the past anyway) they really can’t touch the Hezbollah so they are pounding Beirut hoping to turn the public opinion against Hezbollah. There are report that the Israelis are also dropping propaganda leaflets on Beirut. And it is working.
People in Lebanon now see themselves as victims of Hezbollah’s unprovoked adventurism and support has gone down and not up. I think that the Iranian command knew that this would happen and I really don’t think they would unleash Hezbollah on Israel knowing that it was obvious there would be a regional backlash. Iran has had a much better track record than to come out with a blunder like this.
So thus far Iran will have gained nothing by this, and in fact a lot to loose. There is only one final possibly as to why ‘Iran’ could have initiated this. Lets suppose they initially needed the time to respond to the nuclear package because they were close to finishing off the bomb. Then when it looked that G8 was hell bent on getting a response by July 15th, Iran let Hezbollah loose on Israel to buy off the time to finish the bomb.
Well, I think this is more fiction that fact. The shortest intelligence on Iran’s timeline to the bomb is two year and this was before they found out the UF6 enriched at Natanz was probably stuff bought from China some years ago. Also there are many indications that Iran actually doesn’t want to have the bomb yet, it just wants to have the capability. There is a fine line and Iran doesn’t want to cross it on purpose.
There have been reports during the recent years that also in both aviation and missile industries, Iran has actually “restrained” its efforts instead of going full throttle. This is again not to provoke the Americans. Moreover, a bomb is not going to do anything for Iran. It will take years for the warhead delivery system of the bomb to be reliable and accurate enough for it to be a “threat” to anyone.
So if Iran launched a crude-untested warhead it would be suicide because if would be levelled to the ground by the US submarines in the Persian gulf before they even found out if the missile went anywhere or just ran out of puff mid air. What people forget is that one single bomb, doesn’t make you a threat to anyone, to be a nuclear threat, you need to have many bombs and a reliable means of delivering them to where you want, else you just might end up doing the enemy a favour and taking out yourself.
Where am I going with this? I think that no matter how adventurous, the Iranian leadership must have known that this would be a mess and it would backfire on them. It just doesn’t have anything for Iran. There would have been no scenario that Iran would come out the winner, especially because the Hezbollah capture was a week after the Hamas one and so Iran already knew by that stage that Olmert wasn’t in the mood for talking. I just find it hard to believe Iran set this up.



Comment