Close Guantanamo Now

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rasputin
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2005
    • 63906

    #1

    Close Guantanamo Now

    This morning on NBC’s Meet the Press, Gen. Colin Powell strongly condemned the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, calling it “a major problem for America’s perception” and charging, “if it was up to me, I would close Guantanamo — not tomorrow, this afternoon.”

    He also called for an end to the military commission system the Bush administration has created to try Guantanamo detainees. “I would simply move them to the United States and put them into our federal legal system,” Powell said. He scoffed at criticism that the detainees would have access to lawyers and the writ of habeas corpus: “So what? Let them. Isn’t that what our system’s all about?”

    “[E]very morning I pick up a paper and some authoritarian figure, some person somewhere, is using Guantanamo to hide their own misdeeds,” Powell said. “[W]e have shaken the belief that the world had in America’s justice system by keeping a place like Guantanamo open… We don’t need it, and it’s causing us far more damage than any good we get for it.”

    Powell also sounded off on conservatives, including Vice President Cheney, who oppose diplomacy with Syria and Iran, calling their view “short-sighted.” Powell endorsed direct talks “not to solve a particular problem or crisis of the moment or the day, but just to have dialogue with people who are involved in this region in so many ways.”

    POWELL: But in this arc, which is centered now in Iraq, we have serious difficulties. Serious difficulties that have to be resolved, one, by getting this civil war resolved, and it’s going to take the Iraqis to do that. Two, I believe we should be talking to all of Iraq’s neighbors.

    I think we should be talking to Iran, we should be talking to Syria, not to solve a particular problem or crisis of the moment or the day, but just to have dialogue with people who are involved in this region in so many ways.

    And so I think it is short-sighted not to talk to Syria and Iran and everybody else in the region, and not just for the purpose of making a demand on them, and “I’ll only talk to you if you meet the demand I want to talk to you about.” That’s not the way to have a dialogue in my judgment.

    RUSSERT: Guantanamo. Torture. When John McCain was seeking ways to deal with the issue of torture, you wrote him a letter and said this: “The world is beginning to doubt the moral basis of our fight against terrorism.”

    POWELL: Right.

    RUSSERT: What do you mean?

    POWELL: They are. Guantanamo has become a major, a major problem for America’s perception — as it’s seen, the way the world perceives America. And if it was up to me, I would close Guantanamo — not tomorrow, this afternoon. I’d close it.

    And I’d not let any of those people go. I would simply move them to the United States and put them into our federal legal system. The concern was, well, then they’ll have access to lawyers, then they’ll have access to writs of habeas corpus. So what? Let them.

    Isn’t that what our system’s all about? And by the way, America, unfortunately, has too many people in jail, all of whom had lawyers and access to writs of habeas corpus. And so we can handle bad people in our system.

    And so I would get rid of Guantanamo and I’d get rid of the military commissions system, and use established procedures in federal law or in the manual for courts martial. I would do that because it’s more equatable and it’s more understandable in constitutional terms.

    But I’d also do it because every morning I pick up a paper and some authoritarian figure, some person somewhere, is using Guantanamo to hide their own misdeeds.

    So essentially we have shaken the belief that the world had in America’s justice system by keeping a place like Guantanamo open and creating things like the military commission. We don’t need it, and it’s causing us far more damage than any good we get for it.

    But remember what I started this discussion saying, don’t let any of them go. Put them in a different system, a system that is experienced, that knows how to handle people like this.


    iran
  • Rasputin
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2005
    • 63906

    #2
    Watch it over here :


    iran

    Comment

    • Rasputin
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2005
      • 63906

      #3
      Guantanamo trials unfair: Nuremberg prosecutor

      The US war crimes tribunals at Guantanamo have betrayed the principles of fairness that made the Nazi war crimes trials at Nuremberg a judicial landmark, one of the US Nuremberg prosecutors says.

      "I think Robert Jackson, who's the architect of Nuremberg, would turn over in his grave if he knew what was going on at Guantanamo," Nuremberg prosecutor Henry King Jr said.

      "It violates the Nuremberg principles, what they're doing, as well as the spirit of the Geneva Conventions of 1949."

      King, 88, served under Jackson, the US Supreme Court justice who was the chief prosecutor at the trials created by the Allied powers to try Nazi military and political leaders after World War II in Nuremberg, Germany.

      "The concept of a fair trial is part of our tradition, our heritage," King said from Ohio, where he lives. "That's what made Nuremberg so immortal - fairness, a presumption of innocence, adequate defence counsel, opportunities to see the documents they're being tried with."

      King, who teaches law at Case Western Reserve University in Ohio, also questioned whether former Guantanamo prisoner David Hicks deserved to be tried as a war criminal.

      After being held at Guantanamo for more than five years, the Australian pleaded guilty in March to a charge of providing material support for terrorism and was sent home to serve the rest of his nine-month sentence.

      "He's not an arch-criminal type, just a guy who was disaffected from the system," King said.

      Hicks, who admitted training with al-Qaeda and briefly fighting on its side in Afghanistan, is the only person convicted in the Guantanamo war crimes tribunals.

      King, who interrogated Hitler's architect, Albert Speer, was incredulous that the Guantanamo rules left open the possibility of using evidence obtained through coercion.

      "To torture people and then you can bring evidence you obtained into court? Hearsay evidence is allowed? Some evidence is available to the prosecution and not to the defendants? This is a type of 'justice' that Jackson didn't dream of," King said.

      He said the Guantanamo prisoners should be tried in the court-martial system or the US federal courts, under fair rules that leave open the possibility of acquittal. Three Nuremberg defendants were acquitted, King noted.

      The Bush administration has said it needs to hold the special tribunals at Guantanamo in order to protect national security. Last year the US Supreme Court struck down the first version of the Guantanamo trials as illegal.

      The 2006 Military Commissions Act, which set revised rules for trying suspected terrorists at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, "sort of turns its back on Nuremberg", King said. "I don't think it's a credit to us to have this thing."

      "The United States has always stood for fairness. That's the important thing. We were the ones who started war crimes tribunals and we're the architects. I don't think we should turn our back on that architecture."

      iran

      Comment

      • Rasputin
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2005
        • 63906

        #4
        White House meet on Guantanamo cancelled under pressure

        WASHINGTON (AFP) - The White House on Friday cancelled a planned meeting on the Guantanamo Bay military prison after media reports that it was close to a decision to shut the Cuba detention center.



        White House spokesman Dana Perino denied that a decision on whether to close the controversial camp was "imminent" but reiterated President George W. Bush's avowed aim to shut the center "as soon as possible."

        "It was a private meeting ... people meet on this issue regularly and frequently," Perino said.

        She admitted that a meeting had been planned for Friday between different federal agencies on Friday to discuss Guantanamo Bay, where some 375 "war on terror" suspects are still being held most without charge, and without access to outside visitors.

        She would not say why the meeting was cancelled late Thursday, simply saying it had been an ordinary meeting.

        "I think yesterday's reporting indicates something was imminent. That is not the case," Perino said.

        Time was still needed to work out which of the detainees should be tried by the United States, she said, but insisted there were moves to try to empty the US military base located in southern Cuba.

        "This president has been on record over the years of saying he wants to close Guantanamo Bay, he has directed his administration to work towards that end," she said.

        The State Department is working with countries whose nationals are held in Guantanamo Bay to send some back, Perino said, adding "that has in some way worked, but not as much as we would like."

        A prison is also being renovated in Afghanistan which could then take some of the Guantanamo detainees "but that's going to take a little bit of time," she said.

        "We hope to be able to transfer several dozens back to Afghanistan from Guantanamo in a near future, but nothing is imminent."

        iran

        Comment

        • Rasputin
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2005
          • 63906

          #5
          The poets of Guantanamo

          It has been over five years since the US began locking up prisoners at its military base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

          The about 355 detainees have never been brought to trial, so not much has been heard from inside the jail.

          But a book of poems written by Guantanamo inmates has been published, revealing some of their innermost thoughts.

          A poem by Moazzam Begg, one of 17 Guantanamo detainees whose work is gathered in the slim volume:

          Freedom is spent, time is up –
          Tears have rent my sorrow's cup;
          Home is cage, and cage is steel,
          Thus manifest reality's unreal.

          Some of the poets, like Begg and Martin Mubanga, have been released.

          'A special risk'

          Most, however, like Sami al-Hajj, a cameraman for Al Jazeera, are still detained indefinitely.

          Marc Falkoff, who represents 17 Yemenis at Guantanamo, collected the poems with the help of other defence lawyers.

          Humiliated in the Shackles

          By Sami al-Hajj

          When I heard pigeons cooing in the trees,

          Hot tears covered my face.

          When the lark chirped, my thoughts composed

          A message for my son.

          Mohammad, I am afflicted.

          In my despair, I have no one but Allah for comfort.

          Read more at Prisoner345.net

          At first, the poets were denied regular use of paper and pen, some resorting to scratch their words with pebbles onto Styrofoam cups.

          For years, the Pentagon refused to declassify any of the writing.

          They described poems as "a special risk", because they could contain coded messages.

          The passages in Poems from Guantanamo were cleared before the Pentagon realised they would wind up in a book.

          Falkoff, who is also the editor of the book, said the Pentagon has refused to clear any additional poems in the last year or so.

          He said: "We believe that they've made an effort just to keep this book from coming into print."

          Commander JD Gordan, a Pentagon spokesman, said the detainees "have attempted to use this medium as merely another tool in their battle of ideas against Western democracies".

          The 22 poems in the book were approved only in their English versions, and translated only by security-cleared linguists.

          "The result is that we have workmanlike translations that are not ideal. This of course is due to the Pentagon's restrictions," Falkoff said.

          Expression

          The poets, like in this excerpt of Death Poem by Jumah al-Dossari, a 33-year old Bahraini, speak of love and suffering:

          Take my blood,
          Take my death shroud and
          the remnants of my body.
          Take photographs of my corpse at the grave, lonely.

          Other Guantanamo inmates have used poetry to express their anger with the US government that holds them captive.

          Falkoff said: "There's some strong language, though, and I did not excise that. It's included in here."

          An excerpt from Humiliated in the Shackles, by al-Haj, reads:

          America, you ride on the backs of orphans,
          And terrorize them daily.
          Bush beware.
          The world recognizes an arrogant liar.

          Whatever their artistic merit, Falkoff says the poems shed light on the prisoners' humanity, and give the outside world rare insight into their hopes and fears.

          iran

          Comment

          • Rasputin
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2005
            • 63906

            #6
            صدور کیفرخواست برای شش زندانی گوانتانامو


            خالد شیخ محمد در سال 2003 در پاکستان دستگیر شد
            وزارت دفاع آمریکا می گوید برای 6 نفر از زندانیان بازداشتگاه گوانتانامو، در ارتباط با حملات یازدهم سپتامبر 2001 رسما متهم شده اند.
            دادستان ها برای این 6 متهم تقاضای مجازات مرگ خواهند کرد.

            خالد شیخ محمد، که گفته شده طراح توطئه بوده، از جمله این 6 نفر است.

            قرار است یک دادگاه نظامی بحث انگیز، به این اتهامات رسیدگی کند.

            این اولین باری خواهد بود که زندانیان گوانتانامو، در ارتباط با اتهاماتی که مستقیما به حملات یازدهم سپتامبر مربوط می شود محاکمه می شوند.

            د رحملات یازدهم سپتامبر نزدیک به 3 هزار نفر کشته شدند.

            ژنرال توماس هارتمن، مشاور حقوقی رئیس دفتر کمیسیون نظامی وزارت دفاع آمریکا، گفت اتهامات نشان دهنده این است که القاعده برای حمله به آمریکا" طرح دراز مدت و بسیار پیشرفته ای" داشته است.

            شیخ محمد که گفته می شود هنگام دستگیری در پاکستان در مارس 2003، نفر سوم در رده فرماندهی شبکه القاعده بوده، به قرار گزارشات به گردن زدن دانیل پرل، روزنامه نگار آمریکایی در سال 2002 اعتراف کرده است.

            محاکمه 6 متهم توسط دادگاه نظامی صورت می گیرد که طبق قانون کمیسیون های نظامی، که کنگره آمریکا آن را در سال 2006 تصویب کرد، تشکیل می شود.

            این قانون اجازه تشکیل دادگاه هایی را می دهد که مظنونین به تروریست بودن را که آمریکایی نیستند محاکمه می کند.

            دو تن از زندانیان گوانتانامو به این قانون اعتراض کرده و گفته اند آنها از حقوق خود برای رسیدگی به پرونده شان در دادگاه های مدنی آمریکا، محروم شده اند.



            iran

            Comment

            • mike435
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2006
              • 2104

              #7
              you know whats retarded these retarders cotantly talke about guantanamo but what about other prisions around the world were they tourture students and civillians

              atleast Guantanamo is combatabts

              it such hypocrocy


              G-d determines who walks into your life....It is up to you to decide who you let walk away, who you let stay, and who you refuse to let go.


              Comment

              • siamak
                Member
                • Nov 2003
                • 667

                #8
                The government was accused last night of hiding behind claims of a threat to national security to suppress evidence of torture by the CIA on a prisoner still held in Guantánamo Bay.

                An unprecedented high court ruling yesterday blamed the US, with British connivance, for keeping the "powerful evidence" secret, sparking criticism from lawyers, campaigners and MPs, who claimed the government had capitulated to American bullying.

                Two senior judges said they were powerless to reveal the information about the torture of Binyam Mohamed, an Ethiopian-born British resident, because David Miliband, the foreign secretary, had warned the court the US was threatening to stop sharing intelligence about terrorism with the UK.

                In a scathing judgment, Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones said the evidence, and what MI5 knew about it, must remain secret because according to Miliband, the American threats meant "the public of the United Kingdom would be put at risk".

                The judges made clear they were unhappy with their decision, but said they had no alternative as a result of Miliband's claim. Their ruling revealed that Miliband stuck to his position about the threat to the UK even after Barack Obama signed orders two weeks ago banning torture and announcing the closure of the Guantánamo Bay prison camp.

                Last night Miliband seemingly backtracked on his office's submission, saying there had been no threat by the US to break off intelligence co-operation. "It's American information and it is for the Americans to decide whether to publish their information," Miliband told Channel 4 television.

                Clive Stafford Smith, director of Reprieve, the legal charity and human rights group which acted for Mohamed, said last night: "The US is under a legal duty to investigate the crime of torture, not to suppress evidence that it happened ... For the foreign secretary to give in to these illegal demands by the Bush administration is capitulation to blackmail, pure and simple."

                Yesterday's ruling was the latest in unprecedented court hearings into the abduction of Mohamed, who was seized and held incommunicado in Pakistan in 2002 before being secretly renditioned to Morocco, where he says he was tortured. He was subsequently flown to Afghanistan before being sent to Guantánamo Bay. He has been on hunger strike and the US and UK are discussing his possible return to the UK.

                The ruling, studded with thinly disguised attacks on the attitude of the foreign secretary and the American authorities, came after the judges last year invited the Guardian and other media groups to overturn Miliband's refusal to disclose information in the documents given to him by the US. In a telling passage, the judges said: "Given [the documents'] source and detail, they would ... amount to powerful evidence". None of the contents at issue could possibly be described as sensitive US intelligence, they said.

                In further stinging comments they said: "Moreover, in the light of the long history of the common law and democracy which we share with the United States, it was, in our view, very difficult to conceive that a democratically elected and accountable government could possibly have any rational objection to placing into the public domain such a summary of what its own officials reported as to how a detainee was treated by them and which made no disclosure of sensitive intelligence matters.

                "Indeed we did not consider that a democracy governed by the rule of law would expect a court in another democracy to suppress a summary of the evidence contained in reports by its own officials ... relevant to allegations of torture and cruel, inhumane, or degrading treatment, politically embarrassing though it might be." The judges said yesterday: "It is plainly right that the details of the admissions in relation to the treatment of [Mohamed] as reported by officials of the United States government should be brought into the public domain."

                They urged the Obama administration to reconsider the US position and also said that parliament's intelligence and security select committee must investigate the case in line with extended powers the committee had been granted by Gordon Brown. But the judges noted that the committee meets in private and the prime minister can censor its reports.

                The judges also emphasised that, as the Guardian reported last year, Jacqui Smith, the home secretary, had asked the attorney general to investigate possible "criminal wrongdoing" by MI5 and the CIA over Mohamed's treatment.

                A spokesman for Lady Scotland, the attorney general, said last night the matter was "still under consideration".

                In earlier rulings judges described the American attitude in the case as "deeply disturbing". Miliband is expected to stand by what he told the high court, in a Commons written statement today. He is also expected to repeat the government's condemnation of torture.

                A spokesman for the US state department said: "The US thanks the UK government for its continued commitment to protect sensitive national security information and preserve the long standing intelligence-sharing relationship that enables both countries to protect their citizens. The US investigates allegations and claims of torture ... such as those raised by Binyam Mohamed."

                Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said last night: "Despite best efforts to shine a light on the grubbiest aspects of the 'war on terror', the Foreign Office has claimed that the Obama administration maintained a previous US threat to reconsider intelligence sharing unless our judges kept this shameful skeleton in the closet. We find this Foreign Office allegation ... surprising." David Davis, the former shadow home secretary, said it implied that torture had taken place and British agencies may have been complicit.

                Comment

                • Rasputin
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 63906

                  #9

                  iran

                  Comment

                  Working...