Islamophobia In The World

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rasputin
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2005
    • 63906

    #1

    Islamophobia In The World

    Muslims are suffering physical attacks, verbal taunts and widespread discrimination as a climate of Islamophobia takes a grip across Europe.





    A new report lists a host of examples of crime and intimidation from arson and suspected racist murder in Germany and Spain to pork fat being smeared on a mosque in Italy.

    Thugs in Ireland beat up one man after calling him "bin Laden" while a bogus email in Denmark outlined fake primary school reforms to help migrant children. A maths question read: "Jamal has an AK47 with a 30-shot magazine. If he misses 6 out of 10 shots and he wants to hit each cup 13 times, how many cups can he shoot before he needs to reload?"

    The report from the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia called on leaders to strengthen policies on integration, and on Muslims to " engage more actively in public life."

    It also highlights the lack of reliable data, pointing out that only one country - the United Kingdom - publishes criminal justice data which specifically identify Muslims as victims of hate crime incidents.

    The Muslim population of the EU is estimated to run to around 13m, around 3.5 per cent of the total. Since September 11 many feel "they have been put under a general suspicion of terrorism," according to Beate Winkler, director of the centre.

    The report says that Muslims "experience various levels of discrimination and marginalisation in employment, education and housing" and are "vulnerable to manifestations of prejudice and hatred in the form of anything from verbal threats through to physical attacks on people and property."

    In the Netherlands there was a significant jump in incidents following the murder in 2004 of Theo Van Gogh who made a film criticising Islam.

    In Greece in February 2005 Europe's oldest mosque in Europe, at Poliskio village in Xanthi, was damaged by gunshots. In the same month in Spain Azzouz Housni, a Moroccan farm labourer, was killed at El Ejido in Almería in what migrant groups described as a racist attack.

    In Denmark a gang carrying baseball bats emblazoned with swastikas and racist slogans targeted a Somali family.

    The report says: "Muslims feel that acceptance by society is increasingly premised on 'assimilation' and the assumption that they should lose their Muslim identity. This sense of exclusion is of particular relevance in the face of the challenges posed by terrorism. Muslims feel that since 9/11 they have been put under a general suspicion of terrorism."

    In the UK one non-governmental organisation recorded more than 50 cases of violence against Muslim property, including places of worship in 2004-5.

    There were also more than 100 cases of verbal threats and abusive behaviour aimed at members of the Muslim community.

    iran
  • Rasputin
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2005
    • 63906

    #2
    Islamophobia is a controversial neologism defined as the phenomenon of prejudice against or demonization of Muslims, which manifests itself in general negative attitudes, violence, harassment, discrimination, and stereotyping (particularly vilification in the media). The term dates back to the late 1980s or early 90s,although its use has increased since the September 11, 2001 attacks.Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations, told a UN conference in 2004: "[W]hen the world is compelled to coin a new term to take account of increasingly widespread bigotry, that is a sad and troubling development. Such is the case with Islamophobia."

    The concept is controversial. On the one hand, some commentators see Islamophobia as a real phenomenon that has replaced older forms of racism. For example, Anja Rudiger, Executive Coordinator of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, argues that it is no longer acceptable to use skin color as an attribute to distinguish people, and that religion and culture have become the "markers of seemingly 'natural' kinds of differences." She writes that Islam has become "the new 'other' ..."

    Others have called it a myth, arguing that references to Islamophobia confuse legitimate criticism of Islam with discrimation against Muslims. An intermediate position characterises Islamophobia as a real phenomenon, even if the word is sometimes misused to attack all opponents of Islamic radicalism.


    Islamophobia in Europe


    Ziauddin Sardar writes in The New Statesman that Islamophobia is a widespread European phenomenon, so widespread that he asks whether Muslims will be the victims of the next pogroms. He writes that each country has its extremes, citing Jean-Marie Le Pen in France; Pim Fortuyn, who was assassinated in Holland; and Philippe Van der Sande of Vlaams Blok, a Flemish nationalist party founded in Belgium. Filip Dewinter, the leader of the nationalist Flemish "Vlaams Belang" has said his party is "Islamophobic." He said: "Yes, we are afraid of Islam. The Islamisation of Europe is a frightening thing."

    The clash between European liberal culture and that culture's perception of Islam gives rise to allegations of Islamophobia in a number of areas. Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi's statement that Western civilization is "superior" to Islam was regarded as an example of Islamophobic. In Germany, the state of Baden-Württemberg requires citizenship applicants from the member states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference to answer questions about their attitudes on homosexuality and domestic violence. Clothing has become a flashpoint. France, which has a strong secular tradition separating church and state, was accused of Islamophobia when girls who wear muslim headscarfs were expelled from school under a new law. In January 2006, the Dutch parliament voted in favour of a proposal to ban the burqa in public, which led to similar accusations.

    Sardar argues that Europe is "post-colonial, but ambivalent." Minorities are regarded as acceptable as an underclass of menial workers, but if they want to be upwardly mobile, as Sardar says young Muslims do, the prejudice rises to the surface. Wolfram Richter, professor of economics at Dortmund University, told Sardar: "I am afraid we have not learned from our history. My main fear is that what we did to Jews we may now do to Muslims. The next holocaust would be against Muslims."

    iran

    Comment

    • Rasputin
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2005
      • 63906

      #3
      Efforts against Islamophobia

      There have been efforts against perceived Islamophobia by many organizations in many countries; some of these are detailed below.

      A radio talk show host from 630 WMAL on November 26, 2006 exposed the prevalence of Islamophobia by seeming to advocate a government program to force all Muslims to wear "identifying markers." The hoax was revealed at the end of the program.

      Main article: Jerry Klein’s 2006 Islamophobia Radio Experiment
      Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) states that throughout the 2000s, it has been active in defending American Muslims against Islamophobia.

      In 2006, the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) set up an observatory on Islamophobia which will monitor and document all anti-Islamic activities around the world.

      During the ascession talks regarding Turkeys possible entry to the EU, then Prime Minister of Holland, Jan Peter Balkenende, said Islamophobia must not affect the possibility of Turkey's entry to the European Union.

      50,000 people signed a petition urging the President of France, Jacques Chirac to curb the growing hatred and discrimination towards Muslims in France.

      In the UK, a number of methods aimed at curbing Islamophobia have been set up. In Tower Hamlets, a densely populated area with a large Muslim community, a crime reporting scheme called "Islamophobia - Don't Suffer in Silence" has been set up which police hope will raise awareness of Islamophobia and help them to understand the extent of the problem.

      The British National Union of Teachers (NUT) has issued guidance to teachers in the union advising that teachers have to "Challenge Islamophobia", and that they have a "crucial role" to play in helping to "dispel myths about Muslim communities".

      Following an Islamist demonstration outside the Danish Embassy in London organized by the Al Ghurabaa organization in response to the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, the Muslim Association of Britain organized a peaceful rally in Trafalgar Square attended by over three thousand people, many came by bus from towns and cities throughout the UK. Organizers made available placards and T-shirts bearing the rally's official slogan, the phrase, "United against Islamophobia, united against incitement."

      Following the July 7 bombings, the British government set up a number of initiatives aimed at combatting Islamophobia, including the "National Forum against extremism and Islamophobia". There was also plans by the British government to ban incitement to "religious hatred", however, this failed to get through the House of Commons.

      The Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, said that the Media bore some responsibility for the apparent rise in Islamophobia, and said that a "rising tide of Islamophobia" in the media must be challenged. He compared the reporting of Muslims in contemporary Britain to the way the flight of Jews from Russia had been covered 100 years ago.

      In 2006 the Catholic Mission Austria and the Islamic Demonination Austria created a platform called Christians and Muslims, which works against stereotypes and hostility and aims to increase tolerance and respect. As of July 25, 2006 the platform has 1452 supporters.

      In 1991 the Islamic Culture Foundation (FUNCI) organised, in collaboration with UNESCO and the Institut du Monde Arabe of Paris, an International Conference about the Contribution of Islamic Civilization in European Culture. In March 13, 2003 they created a Manifesto against Islamophobia.
      The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan issued a call in 1999 to world leaders to combat Islamophobia.

      Abdel-Elah Khatib, the Jordanian foreign minister said "The international community must consider how to confront this phenomenon of Islamophobia in order to prevent its proliferation".

      iran

      Comment

      • Rasputin
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2005
        • 63906

        #4
        تحقیقات جامعه*شناختی حاکی از روند رو به رشد طرد مسلمانان مهاجر به اروپا از جانب مردم کشورهای میزبان، به*دلیل "هراس خیالی از اسلام" است.


        گروه پژوهش اجتماعی دانشگاه بیلفلد آلمان به سرپرستی ویلهم هایت مایا در این مسئله وجوه تکان دهنده*ای از بشرستیزی می*بیند که حتی در طبقه متوسط بالای اروپا هم قابل مشاهده است.
        مرکز اروپایی نظارت بر راسیسم و بیگانه ستیزی(EUMC) در جدیدترین گزارش خود خبر از تبعیض علیه مسلمانان در کل اروپا می*دهد، تبعیضی که از سال ۲۰۰۱ رو به افزایش نهاده است.
        به*رغم حملات تروریستی صورت گرفته و با توجه به سوء*ظنی که در محتوای کلی تبلیغات رسانه*ها نسبت به اسلام وجود دارد، این نکته تعجب برانگیز است که مسلمانان تا چه اندازه کم مورد هم*دردی و تفاهم قرار گرفته*اند همان*طور که این نکته نیز موجب تعجب است که چطور عموم مسلمانان به دو طیف مسلمان کاملا صلح*جو و سازگار با جامعه اروپا و مسلمان رادیکال یا حتی تروریست تقسیم شده*اند.
        تردید فزاینده قشر متوسط
        نظر سنجی*های هایت مایا و EUMC مورد سرزنش قرار گرفته*اند که ترسی خیالی به*نام "اسلام*هراسی" را ایجاد کرده*اند به گونه*ای که بحث انتقادی در مورد وضعیت غیرقابل تحمل برخی مسائل در جامعه مسلمین را تحت*الشعاع قرار می*دهد.
        براساس تحقیق دانشگاه بیلفلد، هرکس مخالفت خود با گزینه*های زیر را اعلام کند در واقع دشمنی تقریبی خود با اسلام را ثابت کرده*است:
        "اسلام یک فرهنگ بسیار ارزشمند را با خود به ارمغان آورده است".
        "من با کمال میل حاضرم فرزندم را به مدرسه*ای بفرستم که یک زن مسلمان با حجاب در آن*جا تدریس می کند".
        "این مسئله مسلمانان است و به من ربطی ندارد که آن*ها در انظار عمومی به وسیله بلندگو، دیگران را به نماز و دعا دعوت می کنند".
        البته پی بردن به دشمنی با اسلام از مخالفت با این گزینه*ها می*تواند نشان*دهنده یک پیش داوری و تفکر کلیشه*ای باشد، گرچه الزاما این*طور نیست.
        بر اساس نتایج کلی این تحقیقات که به وسیله پژوهش موسسه سنجش افکار آلنس باخ آلمان نیز تایید می*شود باید گفت این نکته قابل انکار نیست که سوءظن به مسلمانان فقط علیه حاشیه تروریستی نیست، بلکه قلب اقلیت مسلمان در غرب را نشانه گرفته*است. آن*چه به*طور ویژه قابل توجه است، رشد دیدگاه بدبینانه نسبت به مسلمانان درمیان قشر متوسط اروپائیان است، قشری که در جوامع دموکراتیک نقشی مهم در بسط تسامح و تساهل ایفا کرده و پیش پرداخت هزینه سازگاری مهاجران با جامعه میزبان بر عهده آن*ها است. به عبارت دیگر وضعیت اسلام*هراسی شایع در میان این قشر که هیچ*گونه تفاوت دینی - فرهنگی را مجاز نمی*شمارد یک تغییر رادیکال محسوب می*شود.
        برای درک این تغییر کافی است انسان در موارد اختلافات طبیعی مسلمانان با سایر شهروندان اروپایی، مثل دعوا بر سر محل ساخت یک مسجد یا موارد مشابه دیگر در یک گردهمآیی دل*خواهانه شهروندان شرکت کرده تا حتی در میان قشر مرفه حاضر در تجمع نیز سوءظن آمیخته به حس خشم نسبت به مسلمانان را احساس کند. در چنین فضایی، این افراد حتی حاضرند به راحتی هر یک از بندهای قانون اساسی که در مورد آزادی دینی است را نیز قربانی خواست خود کنند.
        قشر مرفه اروپایی به جای تعامل در روند سازگاری مهاجران، این وظیفه را کاملا و تقریبا به نحوی غیر قابل حل برگردن مسلمانان انداخته است.
        انتقاد قابل قبول
        این سکه البته روی دیگری نیز دارد و آن آزادی و خلاصی یافتن از دین و امکان انتقاد متخصصانه و منصفانه از آن است.
        کیفیت یک دین - که البته مقیاس و چند و چون آن نه به نظر آحاد مومنان به آن دین بستگی دارد و نه به روحانیون آن، در نهایت خود را این*گونه به اثبات می*رساند که چگونه با اطمینان و خون*سردی کامل با انتقادها دست و پنجه نرم می*کند و چقدر قادر به تحمل توهین، خصومت و سوءظن دیگران است.
        اما سخن*گویان مسلمین حتی زمانی که دین*شان به حق نیز مورد انتقاد قرار می*گیرد دیگران را به ترویج مفهوم اسلام*هراسی متهم می*کنند، در حالی*که حق انتقاد باید به عنوان یک دستاورد متعالی و غیرقابل تغییر عصر روشن*گری همیشه محترم و محفوظ بماند.
        دموکراسی غربی مدت*ها است که جرم توهین به مقدسات را به نفع هنر و آزادی عقیده، ملغی کرده است، بنابراین زمانی که انسان از آزادی دینی خود استفاده کرده و کاری انجام می*دهد ،حتی اگر این کار مومنان را متالم کند، با دین دشمنی نکرده*است.
        انتقاد از فقدان برابری جنسی یا انتقاد از رفتار غیرقابل قبول با هم*جنس*گرایان در تمام جوامع اسلامی، دقیقا مثل مسئله آوارگی یهودیان، فقط مربوط به بنیادگرایان متعصب نمی*شود بلکه متوجه عموم مسلمانان است و البته باید توجه داشت که مبانی الهیاتی این مسائل نیز سست است.
        اسلام به عنوان یک دین برای تحت فشار قراردادن مردان هم*جنس*باز و زنان، مستمسک*های فراوانی د راختیار مسلمانان قرار نمی*دهد.این مسائل در حقیقت در یک فرهنگ پدر سالار کهنه ریشه دارد که شاخص*های آن را بیشتر می*توان به عنوان امری مرتجعانه توصیف کرد.
        آیا این تفکر کهنه*پرستانه نیست که در کشورهای عربی - اسلامی هم*چنان به طرزی چشم*گیر براین مسئله اصرار می*شود که امور نسل*ها و جنس*های مختلف در جامعه مطابق نظم کهن قبیله*ای اداره شود؟ راستی چرا مسلمانان روشن بین مبارزه واپسین علیه این مسائل را آغاز نمی کنند؟
        نمی*شود گفت هرجا که اسلام*هراسی وجود دارد دشمنی با اسلام هم هست. موضوع جنگ با اسلام از واژگان ابداعی یک سازمان ضد راسیسم سرچشمه می گیرد، واژگانی که «رانی مد تراست» انگلیسی در سال ۱۹۹۷ به عنوان تابوهای انتقادی در فرهنگ*های مختلف و به*خصوص از لحاظ سیاسی، طی یک لیست طولانی ارائه کرد. او گفت: «هر که اسلام را به عنوان یک "ایدئولوژی سیاسی" در نظر بگیرد یا "آن را به سود منافع سیاسی و نظامی مورد استفاده قرار دهد" یا کسی که "حق انتقاد به اسلام را در غرب به*طور کلی مردود بداند" با اسلام دشمنی کرده است».
        ***
        مسئله امروز مسلمانان در اروپا محدودیت*های اجتماعی آنان است. مساجد، مدارس و قبرستان*های مسلمین تخریب می شود. آن*ها در موسسات و سازمان*های عمومی و در مسیر تحصیل و زندگی شغلی خود به خاطر دینشان یا به دلیل ظواهر اسلامی*شان مورد تبعیض قرار می*گیرند.
        فاشیسم اسلامی
        مفهوم دیگری که در اردوگاه منتقدین اسلام رواج یافته و به موضوعی برای جنگ و ستیز بدل شده است "فاشیسم اسلامی" است. دیرگاهی است که افرادی آشنا با اسلام، مانند منفرد هلپرن، ماگزیم رودین سون و مالیز روتفن، این تعبیر جدید را رواج داده و روزنامه*نگاران چپ و راست مانند کریستوفر هیکنس یا آندرو سولیوان نیز با استفاده از آن حمایت خود از جنگ عراق را مستدل کرده*اند و به*تازگی جورج بوش و آنگلا مرکل نیز به جرگه علاقمندان به این عبارت پیوسته*اند.
        در این میان باید از نقش فعالان دموکراسی در مقابله با فاشیسم اسلامی پرسید. آیا دموکرات*های غربی تنها زمانی از بی*تفاوتی، رخوت و خودشیفتگی بیرون خواهند آمد که برق شمشیر هیتلر را بالای سر خود ببینند؟ آیا حتما لازم است که چنین مشابهت تاریخی خطرناکی ترسیم شود تا اهمیت ضدیت با جهادگرایی روشن شود؟
        خصلت استبدادی تقریبا تمام رژیم*های اسلامی، از مراکش گرفته تا مالزی و هم*چنین پتانسیل دیکتاتورگری جنبش*های الهیاتی در اردوگاه شیعیان[؟!] مانند گروه ترور القاعده، غیرقابل مناقشه است.
        خصلت فاشیسم به ویژه درمورد پیوند خویشاوندی میان یهودستیزی فاشیستی و جنگ امروز میان اسلام*گرایان علیه یهودیان و آمریکایی*ها که نئونازیست*ها را به هم*بستگی با اسلام سوق داده است، به خوبی صدق می*کند. به لحاظ تاریخی نیز "ورژن کلیسایی فاشیسم" که در اثناء جنگ بیش از همه در اتریش و اروپای شرقی میانه رواج داشت، با سرکوب و خشونت دینی در دنیای امروز فرق چندانی نمی*کند.
        البته اختلافات فراوانی میان پدیده فاشیسم اروپایی و جهادگرایی وجود دارد. در حالی*که اولی توانسته مفهوم دولت - ملت قومی را پیش نهاده و هیچ*گونه تلفیقی میان فرهنگ دینی متداول و جنبش*های اجتماعی را بر نمی*تابد، جهادگرایی برعکس، یک گرایش اجتماعی رادیکال علیه مسیحیت و سایر ادیان است.
        با توجه به این مسائل، شناسایی آگاهانه دشمن و آن*گونه که ولف لپنیز می*گوید یک "دشمن پژوهی" خود انعکاسی ضروری می*نماید. این مطلب را برنده سال گذشته جایزه صلح کتابفروشی*های آلمان، در کمال تعجب و حیرت مقامات کلیسای پائول و عموم مخاطبان صلح*طلب بیان کرد و با ذکر این جمله چشم خود را بر وضعیت آماده باش جنگی در "جنگ فرهنگ*ها" فرو بست.
        ***
        گفت*وگو در باره مسائلی از قبیل آن*چه گذشت می*تواند دستاوردهای مفیدی برای عموم مردم و نیز برای رشته مطالعات فرهنگی در برداشته باشد. پیش شرط هرگونه بحث و تحقیق در مورد رابطه اسلام و مدرنیته، گذر از شعارها و موضوعات جنگ*برانگیزاننده*ای مانند اسلام*هراسی و فاشیسم اسلامی و نیز دوری از پیش*داوری، غلبه بر مسائل جدلی و برداشتن عینک سیاسی*نگری از چشمان است.

        iran

        Comment

        • Rasputin
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2005
          • 63906

          #5
          Islamophobia in Turkey: A kind of self-hatred?

          Orhan Kemal CENGIZ
          In my opinion, the term “Islamophobia” is insufficient for and incapable of explaining the situation in Turkey. “Islamophobia”, a term created to describe the Western reaction to Islam, does not operate with the same clarity in the Turkish context.

          For Westerners, Islam is a totally external entity, something completely foreign, with Muslims in Europe and the U.S. representatives of this foreign culture. However, in the Turkish context we are talking about a predominantly Muslim society in which some people have a strong dislike or even hate toward devout Muslims and public manifestations of Islam.

          Sometimes these feelings are so strong that there are those who would rather experience another coup than see religious people in the government. We can call a Westerner Islamophobic for his or her reaction to something totally external to his or her culture, but the term does not work when describing a reaction to something one has been raised in or at least surrounded by his or her whole life.

          I suggest a new word be forged for this phenomenon in the Turkish context, although I am not able to create it at the moment. However, to help produce this new word I would like to share my ideas with you by thinking aloud. With all due respect to secular people in Turkey, and apologizing in advance for any inconvenience this article may create, I will start my brainstorming.

          I have a tendency to think that whenever we show a strong emotional reaction toward something, a reaction out of proportion to the situation, we should look inside ourselves to find the root cause of this reaction.

          Why and how some people in Turkish society built up these strong negative feelings toward devout Muslims? How did these otherwise intelligent and sophisticated people become myopic when it comes to Islam and Muslims in Turkey? How did democratic people, highly tolerant in respect of many different things in their lives, become so intolerant toward the lifestyles of Muslims? Why do we see analyses of political Islam every day, speculations on hidden agendas, and discussions of many related things that are far from the realities of this country?

          A new description is needed

          As I said earlier, for Westerners Islam and Muslims are totally external subjects and therefore “phobia” can be an accurate term to explain and understand their reactions. However, how can we explain individuals' fear, dislike, abhorrence, or hate toward something in which they have been raised? As I also said above, this is a kind of thinking aloud with no claim of being scientific at all, but I have a hypothesis about these strong emotions. In my view, Islamaphobia in Turkey represents a kind of self-hatred or at least self-dissatisfaction.

          We have quite a Western lifestyle. We drink alcohol, our relations with the opposite sex are relaxed, and the way we dress and behave are quite Western. No one interferes with our lifestyles. However, when we see a woman swimming in the sea with a head to toe swimsuit on, or crowded group of women with headscarves, we become very angry! Why we are so irritated with this? Do they remind us we are not Western enough, that we have strong roots in the East? Or maybe something closer, more private? Do they tap into our emotional baggage we still carry from the struggle with our parents who were devout whereas we became atheists or non-practicing Muslims? Are we “latent Muslims” who could not resolve our intellectual and emotional struggle with Islam? Do these people represent our repressed side?

          I think we must ask ourselves these and other similar questions. When I read some comments by distinguished secular intellectuals in Turkey, I cannot stop thinking that for them the only solution is that all devout Muslims become secular; that Muslim women relinquish their headscarves, or there will be no peace in Turkey! Is our peace based on the idea that some people in our society must change their beliefs and religious practices so they better resemble us? Can we accept something like this?

          We do not have to like devout Muslims but they also have the right to lead their lives in accordance with their beliefs. People have the right to believe what we think is total nonsense, and to do things we find nonsensical as well. In my opinion, freedom of religion is one of the key freedoms necessary for Turkey to be completely democratic because in this way we will accept that people who, in our opinion believe in nonsense and lead their lives accordingly, are also adults and no one has the right to force them to live a certain way. I can hear the objections – “we are not against the devout Muslims or any religion but we are against political Islam!” But the problem is that in Turkey, people's attempts to lead their lives in a manner suitable to their beliefs are being seen and labeled as the manifestation of political Islam!

          The question remains, do we really, objectively see any danger that a religious state will be established in Turkey, or is it our very strong dislike of the Muslim lifestyle that leads us to smell danger in the wind that will justify our hatred toward…ourselves perhaps?

          iran

          Comment

          • Rasputin
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2005
            • 63906

            #6
            The United Nations investigator on racism on Friday condemned a rising trend of Islamaphobia, especially in Europe, where he said it was being exploited by some right-wing political parties.

            Doudou Diene, U.N. special rapporteur on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related forms of intolerance, also accused Switzerland's most popular party, the right-wing Swiss People's Party (SVP/UDC), of inciting hatred.

            He urged the withdrawal of the party's controversial campaign poster calling for expulsion of foreigners who commit serous crimes, depicting three white sheep booting out a black sheep under the headline "For the Security of All".

            "In the current context, Islamaphobia constitutes the most serious form of religious defamation," Diene said in a speech and report to the U.N. Human Rights Council, whose 47 member states were holding a debate on religious defamation.

            More and more political leaders and influential media and intellectuals were "equating Islam with violence and terrorism," and some were seeking to "silence religious practices by banning the construction of mosques", Diene said.

            Pakistan, speaking for the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC), called the rise of Islamaphobia "alarming".

            "Recent acts of defamation in the shape of blasphemous sketches in Sweden and posters in Switzerland reinforce this conclusion. Such blasphemy should not be encouraged in the name of freedom of expression," Pakistan's envoy Masood Khan said.

            He said the 57-nation OIC, which represents 1.3 billion Muslims, condemned terrorism in all its forms.

            "The international media continues to use the misguided actions of a small extremist minority as an excuse to malign the entire Muslim world, as well as the religion of Islam," he said.

            "SCAPEGOATING"

            Diene, a Senegalese lawyer, said in his 21-page report to the Council that Islamaphobia had grown since the Sept 11 2001 attacks on the United States.

            Worldwide, an increasing number of traditional democratic parties were "resorting to the language of fear and exclusion, scapegoating and targeting ethnic or religious minorities in general, and immigrants and refugees in particular", he said.

            In Europe, Muslims faced growing difficulties to establish places of worship and carry out their religious practices such as dietary regimens and burials, according to the U.N. envoy.

            "Political parties with open anti-Islamic platforms have joined governmental coalitions in several countries and started to put in place their political agendas. In sum, Islamophobia is in the process of permeating all facets of social life."

            The Swiss SVP/UDC has launched a referendum to ban construction of minarets in the Alpine country, home to 350,000 Muslims. A similar move is underway in Cologne, Germany.

            Switzerland's delegation defended its system of direct democracy, where multiple issues are put to referendum each year, saying it showed great political transparency although "sometimes with exaggerated, regrettable views being expressed".

            "The Swiss government has repeatedly stated its commitment to fight racism and the Swiss government will continue to take a clear stance against all forms of discrimination and xenophobia," Swiss ambassador Blaise Godet said.

            iran

            Comment

            • Rasputin
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2005
              • 63906

              #7
              Hey people...you want to become famous and get attention?

              Well, it seems that one of the easiest way to fame in 2008 is Islam bashing.

              Recent attempts at fear mongering, hate, and uneducated characterizations of Islam include the newly released Dutch films, "Fitna the Movie: Geert Wilders' film about the Quran" and the cartoon, "The life of Mohammad," by Iranian-Dutch politician Ehsan Jami. Both of these directors are public figures in the Netherlands.

              It seems that anyone who once dreamed of gaining fame can simply generalize Islam as a hateful religion and make negative and offensive comments.

              I have to point out that criticism of people's ways is fair. People make mistakes and go astray. We intrude on one another's forms of pleasures and step on one another's rights as human beings. And pointing out the flaws of others for the sake of devaluing them is not a difficult task.

              To be constructive, however, is a much more daunting but valuable endeavour, especially for artists and public figures who want to practice freedom of speech and make the world more livable for all human-kind.

              I believe that it is unfortunate and shameful on the part of weak artists who strive to gain attention under the pretext of freedom of speech.

              I celebrate freedom of speech, but I speak within the realm of constructive and positive feedback. I speak within the realm of love, of dialogue, of discussion.

              I have met some Muslim fanatics in my time at various Mosques and religious centres. However, instead of making fun of them and offending them, I have tried to understand them and make them listen to my interpretations of the Quran.

              I believe that the distinction is the difference between freedom of speech and "freedom of hate speech."

              I believe that Islam, after all, is simply a way of life. Bringing up fanatical and misguided interpretations of any way of life - including Islam - and using those exceptions as a fear mongering tool is the undertone of Islam-bashers' new line of business: they sell hatred, not love; they want to separate people instead of bringing us together.

              If the Dutch film makers were really educated intellectuals who sought to make the world a better place; and if they truly wanted to express themselves, I suggest that they should have simply sought to take the best things out of every religion and every philosophy and changed their own selves instead of bashing others' potential for wrong doings.

              I will change the world by changing myself.

              iran

              Comment

              • Rasputin
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2005
                • 63906

                #8
                Islamophobia: Insight Into the Prejudice Muslims and the Religion of Islam Face in the United States

                By: Karen L. Hernandez-Andrews

                Prejudice sentiment in America is a very delicate subject. With so many issues surrounding prejudice today, involving so many different people from varied backgrounds, it seems to always be at the forefront of our society. From the election of our first African American President, to the immigration issues surrounding legal and illegal immigrants in to the United States, prejudice has changed, increased, and in some cases, decreased, around many groups of people.

                Before moving on, it is important to have a common, simple definition of prejudice. Prejudice is defined as, “Unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, especially of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group.” When referring to this definition, prejudice in America began long ago, with the colonizers who first came over from across the Atlantic. Beginning with slavery; then with the decimation of the Native American people, forcing them from their land to live on reservations; to segregation of blacks; to internment camps of Asian-Americans during World War II - the groups that faced and face prejudice today are Native Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans, Latin Americans and many other immigrant groups. The violence these groups faced and still face today, range from lynchings, to mass killings, to blatant hate crimes involving not only death by guns, but also by rape, torture, dragging deaths, bombs, and burning people alive.

                Since the 1970’s, when America began to see the first massive influx of immigrant Muslims, many who fled Afghanistan after the Russian invasion in 1979 - the fear of and prejudice against Muslims and the religion of Islam has existed in the United States. With different clothing, a different color of skin, different foods, different cultural customs and several different languages, it is safe to say that this fear, now coined as “Islamophobia,” has existed in America for quite sometime, and since 9/11, Islamophobia is at its highest awareness ever.

                Many may wonder - what is Islamophobia? Where does this term stem from? The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) states, “Islamophobia refers to unfounded fear of and hostility toward Islam. Such fear and hostility leads to discrimination against Muslims, exclusion of Muslims from mainstream political or social process, stereotyping, the presumption of guilt by association, and finally, hate crimes. In twenty-first century America, all of these evils are present and in some quarters tolerated.” CAIR continues by stating, “Islamophobia as a term and as a phenomena gained currency in part due to the popular thesis developed by Francis Fukuyama and Samuel Huntington that argued about an impending clash of civilization between Islam and the West. When 9-11 happened, the people, already predisposed to viewing Islam with suspicion, jumped on this bandwagon and through a multitude of outlets have been successful in creating a climate of extreme prejudice, suspicion and fear against Muslims.” CAIR further explains that Islamophobia has resulted in the general and unquestioned acceptance of the following:

                 Islam is monolithic and cannot adapt to new realities.
                 Islam does not share common values with other major faiths.
                 Islam as a religion is inferior to the West. It is archaic, barbaric and irrational.
                 Islam is a religion of violence and supports terrorism.
                 Islam is a violent political ideology.

                The fear and prejudice of Muslims and the religion of Islam that grips America is a fear that is brought on by many existing factors. It is my opinion that mass media is one of the biggest parties in the negative portrayal of Islam and Muslims. When I refer to mass media, I am referring to everything from news shows, to television shows, films, images and even the internet. The fact is that it is almost impossible to not turn on the television every night and hear of yet again, another terrorist attack or suicide bomber. What we don’t hear along with this report is the moderate Muslim speaking out that day, condemning terrorism, in many places around the United States and the world, issuing statement after statement – statements that are rarely and mostly never carried in the news. My reaction to this is that reporting on the existing “War on Terror” and the killing of innocent people in the name of religion is much more “sexy” than the Imam, the CAIR representative, or the Muslim woman activist talking about how Islam does not justify the killing of anyone - ever.

                iran

                Comment

                • Rasputin
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 63906

                  #9
                  In her book, The Muslim Next Door; The Qur’an, The Media and that Veil Thing, Sumbul Ali-Karamali writes about the several things that lead people to react with Islamophobic tendencies. One of her top reasons, as I have already pointed out, is the media. She states, “The media constantly gives a disproportionate airing to the miniscule percentage of extremist Muslims so that we get the impression that all Muslims are just like them. After the September 11th attacks, twenty hijackers illogically became the symbol for the religion of some one billion, four hundred million people. When non-Muslims commit crimes, we do not assume all their co-religionists are criminals.” Incidentally, it’s important to recognize that Ali-Karamali’s book is listed on jihadwatch.org - a site that is probably one of the most Islamophobic websites on the internet. There is a section devoted entirely to her book, called “Ten Questions for The Muslim Next Door.” After a list of questions and assumptions, trying to prove the book to be another, “deception” about Islam, there are several comments below from readers that are frightening and unquestionably prejudice - one example being, “This veil-less chick reminds me of when it was reported that the [KKK] had dumped the white sheets for business suits to seem more modern and less threatening. Just lipstick on a pig.”

                  The media is extremely good at distorting images and making situations seem what they are not. A prime example, are the images out of Palestine after 9/11 that showed a crowd of Palestinians jumping up and down celebrating what occurred here in the United States. One headline read, “Muslims all over the world celebrate attacks.” Ali-Karamali points out that the reality is that this was one, very small group of people, in a small village, that was under siege by the Israeli military, brandishing American-made weapons. This in no way condones their celebration of the death of thousands of people, but the reality is that Muslims were not celebrating all over the world as the media led people to believe. No, in fact, there were at least one-hundred responses from the Muslim world condemning the acts of terror. In the United States Institute of Peace Special Report, Islamic Peacemaking Since 9/11, released in January 2009, we are reminded how the Muslim world responded and how they keep responding to Islamic extremism. Right after 9/11, several organizations and Muslims spoke out, condemning the acts of terror as vicious, cowardly, barbaric and un-Islamic - most notable were the Council for American Islamic Relations, the Fiqh Council of North America, (the highest judicial body for Islam in the US), the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia - Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, (a prominent Islamic scholar), Chief Islamic Justice Sheikh Izz-Eddine al-Khatib al-Tamimi of Jordon, Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, former Iranian President Seyyed Mohammad Khatami, and Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak. As the War on Terror has progressed and Islamic extremism has spread to such noted places as Bali, Madrid and London, the condemnations continue to come from the Muslim world as well. In 2004, King Abudullah II of Jordon in his Amman Message declared, “On religious and moral grounds, we denounce the contemporary concept of terrorism that is associated with wrongful practices, whatever their source and form may be. Such acts are represented by aggression against human life in an oppressive form that transgresses the rulings of God, frightening those who are secure, violating peaceful civilians, finishing off the wounded, and killing prisoners; and they employ unethical means, such as destroying buildings and ransacking cities: ‘Do not kill the soul that God has made sacrosanct, save for justice.’” (Qur’an 6:151).

                  The most recent nationwide case of an Islamophobic reaction in the media was last February, when Aasiya Zubair Hassan was brutally murdered by her husband. As the news hit the airwaves, the fact that Hassan was Muslim did too. Suddenly, within a couple of days, the killing was an “honor killing” and many were spouting that Islam is a religion of violence and Hassan’s death is just another facet of this violent religion. The fact is that Aasiya Hassan’s murder was not an honor killing - it was domestic violence, plain and simple. We did not hear of the other twenty or so women in the US who lost their lives that week due to domestic violence. Yes, every day, an average of three women die at the hands of their spouses or boyfriends across the United States. They are Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Atheist, Ba’hai, and yes, Muslim, but religion is not what causes domestic abuse. As Daisy Khan, Director of the American Society for Muslim Advancement in New York City wrote in the On Faith column in the Washington Post dated February 27, 2009, about Aasiya Hassan: “While I would unequivocally assert that domestic violence and religion share no connection, that religion encourages harmonious relationships in the home, nonetheless, we would be naïve to ignore the fact that some men use religious justifications to spread hate in the home. Their actions stem from other factors, namely psychological problems (a superiority complex), cultural distortions of religion (withholding rights and dignity from women), and other, economic or personal factors (frustration and anger taken out at home). But this is not religion. The apt question, therefore, is not “Is there a connection between religion and domestic violence,” but rather, what are religious leaders and laypeople doing to combat these practices? Our leaders must unequivocally deny these actions, both from within the faith and the law of the land; furthermore, they must take proactive steps to tackle the issue within our communities, whatever its many causes.”

                  Back in September, there was a massive Islamophobic campaign. The Clarion Fund, a 501c(3) non-profit that is said to have supported John McCain, paid newspapers all over the US, mostly in swing states, including Ohio, Colorado, Iowa, Nevada and New Hampshire, to distribute the anti-Islamic documentary DVD, Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West. With at least twenty-eight million DVDs sent to over seventy newspapers, people received their weekend paper with the DVD bundled up inside. Shown originally on Fox news, the film goes as far as to cut between scenes of the Holocaust and Muslim children as suicide bombers - as if the comparison is unquestionable and natural. There are infamous “Islamophobes” in the film such as Daniel Pipes, was quoted quite a few years ago saying, “Western European societies are unprepared for the massive immigration of brown-skinned peoples cooking strange foods and maintaining different standards of hygiene...All immigrants bring exotic customs and attitudes, but Muslim customs are more troublesome than most.” (quoted in the National Review, 1990). Walid Shoebat is also in the film. Shoebat argues that parallels exist between radical Islam and Nazism. As I researched this, I wondered if any of the newspapers distributing the DVD questioned the content of the material and the blatant prejudice and racism of the film. On Huffington’s Post, I found this: “The Raleigh (NC) News & Observer reported yesterday on its ”Under The Dome” politics blog, that the paper is preparing to bundle copies of the DVD with this Saturday’s newspapers. Jim McClure, vice president of display advertising for the News &Observer, said the “ultimate decision” to distribute the DVDs had been made by publisher Orage Quarles, and compared the propaganda to harmless household samples. Quote, ‘Obviously, we have distributed other product samples, whether it’s cereal or toothpaste,’ he said. He declined to say how much the agency paid.” It is good to know, however, that readers, of at least this newspaper, were voicing their disdain for the film, with one writing in and stating: “A box of cereal? Toothpaste? Does a box of cereal or a tube of toothpaste encourage me to look with hatred and suspicion on my law abiding neighbors who have a different religion than mine? Does cereal and toothpaste lead to pogroms, religious harassment, fear and intimidation? The trailer for this video is about hate, pure and simple, and shows the video has only one goal - to instill fear and hatred of neighbor against neighbor. If I receive this DVD in my paper, that day, after twenty-two years of receiving the News & Observer, will be the last day of my subscription. Please, please reconsider this decision!”

                  iran

                  Comment

                  • Rasputin
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 63906

                    #10
                    Unfortunately there are many organizations and groups that support and encourage Islamophobia in the US. An event sponsored by one of these groups is held on college campuses around the nation. Called, Islamofacist Awareness Week, this is an in-your-face event, meant to slur, promote hate and exacerbate prejudice about Muslims and the religion of Islam. Sponsored by the David Horowitz Freedom Center – which is also the creator of the Terrorism Awareness Project, which formed in response to 9/11, the Terrorism Awareness Project was created as the umbrella organization to run Islamofacist Awareness Week. In regard to this, The Freedom Center states: “After conferring with students from several universities who were concerned about both the ignorance about the objectives of Islamic fascism among their fellow students and also the “unholy alliance” between campus leftists and jihadists seeking to undermine the War on Terror, the Freedom Center has launched a Terrorism Awareness Project.” It further explains the project by stating, “This Project will provide conservative students with an intellectual toolkit containing all the elements of the truth about jihad: a speakers’ bureau featuring figures such as Steve Emerson, Daniel Pipes and Robert Spencer; DVDs of films such as “Obsession” that dramatically underline the threat we face; printed material about the Islamists’ objectives and the successes they have had in penetrating Western culture and its institutions. The Terrorism Awareness Project will work in cooperation with Students for Academic Freedom, which now has chapters in over 150 college campuses, to help conservative student activists to demand equal time—in the classroom as well as at campus-wide events—whenever the left presents its propaganda about the war and the intentions of those who regard America as ‘the Great Satan.’”

                    On the Terrorism Awareness Project website, in the About Us section, it states, in part: “The war against the Islamic jihad and its religion of terror will be decisively won if we both understand the nature of the threat that confronts us and have the will to face it. The Terrorism Awareness Project will assist in achieving both these objectives. Under its banner, college students across America can take their place in defending America, which is under siege both abroad and at home.”

                    Last October, seventy-nine universities (some as far as the United Kingdom), took part in Islamofacism Awareness Week. In the update available online, the Terrorism Awareness Project states: “Our two previous IFA Weeks included demonstrations that involved thousands of college students, and it became evident how deeply embedded pro-Islamist Muslim student groups had become and how influential they were in making sure there was no meaningful dialogue on the War on Terror in our universities. Therefore, the Terrorism Awareness Project decided to focus Islamo-Fascism Awareness Week III on how to ‘Stop the Jihad on Campus.’ In particular, we wanted to educate others about danger represented by the growing power of the Muslim Student Association, a group which, as documents captured by the FBI have shown, is part of a network of ‘front groups’ established in this county two decades ago by the Muslim Brotherhood (godfather organization to al Qaeda) to wage a ‘stealth jihad’ of subversion against American institutions paralleling the armed jihad it was waging against American troops abroad.”

                    Prejudice is defined as, “Unreasonable feelings, opinions, or attitudes, especially of a hostile nature, regarding a racial, religious, or national group.” As illustrated above, the prejudice that Muslims face in the United States is “Islamophobia” at its worst. Islamophobia is real; it is tangible; it is ugly. Until we, as human beings, see beyond the labels, see beyond our own fears, and see beyond our own insecurities and view our neighbors as human beings regardless of the color of their skin and their religion, our society will remain in this status quo of prejudice and dehumanization. I find that unacceptable. I hope you do as well.

                    ----

                    Karen Hernandez-Andrews graduated from Andover Newton Theological School in 2007 with an M.A. Theological Research in Christian-Muslim Understanding. Her thesis entitled, Christians and Muslims: Their Tumultuous Historical Relations, Their Theological Differences and Their Inherent Beliefs—What Does This Mean for Our Future? includes her field work in India where she lived for two months in the Summer of 2006 researching Christian-Muslim relations in Banaras. Karen graduated from Wellesley College as a Davis Scholar in 2005 with a B.A. in Peace and Justice Studies with a concentration in Islam. At Wellesley she studied Islam extensively and wrote her thesis on Al Qaeda and how they misuse religion for political gain. Currently, Karen teaches and lectures at colleges, high schools and churches, as well as with various organizations about Islam, global Christian-Muslim understanding and relations, Al Qaeda, Theological responses to terrorism, Islamophobia, and Discrimination Against Muslims Post 9/11. In March, Karen traveled with a peacemaking delegation from Christian Peacemaker Teams to Israel and Palestine where she learned first hand about the efforts on the ground to end the conflict. Karen has authored and published an academic paper for the Women’s United Nations Report Network entitled, Talaq, Talaq, Talaq-Women Suffering In India Because of the Misuse of Triple Talaq, and she is also working on publishing a curriculum on Islam. In September, Karen begins work on a Master of Sacred Theology in Religion and Conflict at Boston University School of Theology, where she plans to develop a theory on theology and conflict that has yet to be explored. In her “spare time” Karen is a choreographer, loves to row, hike, swim and more, loves spending time with her daughter.

                    iran

                    Comment

                    Working...