Exobiology and the press
When and if we discover extraterrestrial life, the handling of the news will be interesting. Recall the tumultuous media circus following the announcement in the movie Contact. Carl Sagan knew a little about dealing with the press, and the film version gets across what might happen when you start broadcasting public fear and fascination through a cable TV and Net-connected world. Or think of the recent rumblings when the SETI Institute said it was about to make a ‘major announcement,’ which turned out to be business related and not extraterrestrial at all.And in point of fact, we do have one actual experience of trying to announce extraterrestrial life. That was in 1996, when a team of researchers had submitted a paper, subsequently accepted, to Science. The contents were dynamite, for the authors proposed that the Antarctic meteorite ALH84001 might be evidence of life on Mars. The team had studied four potential biomarkers within the meteorite, which had earlier been determined to be of Martian origin, and the circus soon began.NASA scheduled a news conference, aware of the public interest that must follow, even though the evidence for life was equivocal at best. But a member of the White House staff spilled the beans to his girlfriend about the upcoming Science story, so the word had already leaked. Add to that the fact that a prepublication version of the story was given to the press earlier than planned.
The result: hoping to avoid being scooped, a number of news outlets started distributing the paper to get quotes from experts to bolster their upcoming stories. The work on ALH84001 thus began its journey from interesting paper to ‘discovery.’Today we have no definitive take on the Martian meteorite, but the fact that there are alternative explanations to the possible biomarkers leads many to doubt their validity. Whatever the case, contrast this situation — researchers working in strict secrecy until the press sniffs out their forthcoming paper — to what may happen with a Mars sample return mission. The scientists who work on the first samples will be operating from the start under public scrutiny, looking both for biohazards and for evidence of life while under pressure to work quickly.
When and if we discover extraterrestrial life, the handling of the news will be interesting. Recall the tumultuous media circus following the announcement in the movie Contact. Carl Sagan knew a little about dealing with the press, and the film version gets across what might happen when you start broadcasting public fear and fascination through a cable TV and Net-connected world. Or think of the recent rumblings when the SETI Institute said it was about to make a ‘major announcement,’ which turned out to be business related and not extraterrestrial at all.And in point of fact, we do have one actual experience of trying to announce extraterrestrial life. That was in 1996, when a team of researchers had submitted a paper, subsequently accepted, to Science. The contents were dynamite, for the authors proposed that the Antarctic meteorite ALH84001 might be evidence of life on Mars. The team had studied four potential biomarkers within the meteorite, which had earlier been determined to be of Martian origin, and the circus soon began.NASA scheduled a news conference, aware of the public interest that must follow, even though the evidence for life was equivocal at best. But a member of the White House staff spilled the beans to his girlfriend about the upcoming Science story, so the word had already leaked. Add to that the fact that a prepublication version of the story was given to the press earlier than planned.
The result: hoping to avoid being scooped, a number of news outlets started distributing the paper to get quotes from experts to bolster their upcoming stories. The work on ALH84001 thus began its journey from interesting paper to ‘discovery.’Today we have no definitive take on the Martian meteorite, but the fact that there are alternative explanations to the possible biomarkers leads many to doubt their validity. Whatever the case, contrast this situation — researchers working in strict secrecy until the press sniffs out their forthcoming paper — to what may happen with a Mars sample return mission. The scientists who work on the first samples will be operating from the start under public scrutiny, looking both for biohazards and for evidence of life while under pressure to work quickly.
Comment