ewwww ahmadinejad is uglyyyyyyyyyyy
M Ahmadinejad
Collapse
X
-
-
wow mr red wine, you really have changed your tone when i first read your other views i was really impressed and actually quite proud of, how ever you are very mozi, i dont understand you one min your defending iran next your critiscing the new president, the way he dresses or speaks should be the very last thing on your mind, instead you should highlight his intentions for iran and how he will bring changes to iran. Now i know your gona say that its not right that he was choosen and so on, however should you take into account that it was the nation of iran who decided mr ahmadinejad in becoimg the new president, the youth of iran choose him. That must mean something to you right????????
Comment
-
are you sure of this?Originally posted by saraamin55however should you take into account that it was the nation of iran who decided mr ahmadinejad in becoimg the new president, the youth of iran choose him.

Comment
-
wow, red wine bahale inkaret
ama khodayeesha harchi un bad bakht khatami irano too siasate khariji(va na dakhli ke hich kari narkard harche avz shod daste mardom bood) anjam dad in ahmadanijead dare kharab mikone. khodayeesh ki az ghanoone asasi sar dar miare!!!!!! mitune bege aya ghanooni hast baraye raeesjomhoori ke salahiate postesho nadre , aya mishe ye joori avazesh kard!!!!!





MAHSA

[/CENTER]
Comment
-
Nemidoonam chera shomaha injoori mibinid ! Ahmadi nejad hich kareh hast ! yeki mesleh Khatami montaha bedooneh ammameh ! dastoorha az khamenei mireseh beh ahmadi nejad ! un hast keh iran ro mi charkhuneh va hich kas ham zooresh behesh nemireseh !
iran
Comment
-
ama khodayeesh siasate kharejie ma too un doreye 8 saleyekhatami kheili pishrafte khoobi dasht. yek sima do tarze barkhordesh bood ke keshvaraye dige hemayatesh kardan, ama in na be dakhel va na be kharej ba raftarash rahm nemikoneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. hade aghal khatami mahboob bood,ama in chi!!!! hata unayee ke entekhabesh kardan hala mifahmman che ghalati kardan.





MAHSA

[/CENTER]
Comment
-
daghighan! inaham hamash plan hast....8 sal ye moderate gozashtan alaki dele mardomo khosh konan....bad alan yek fanatic.. hamash plan e ina!Originally posted by RedWineNemidoonam chera shomaha injoori mibinid ! Ahmadi nejad hich kareh hast ! yeki mesleh Khatami montaha bedooneh ammameh ! dastoorha az khamenei mireseh beh ahmadi nejad ! un hast keh iran ro mi charkhuneh va hich kas ham zooresh behesh nemireseh !
Comment
-
The volatile political situation in Iran should alarm historical intellectuals. Less than seventy years after Hitler committed mass genocide against millions of innocent people in Nazi Germany, a new anti-Christ has emerged from the land of Ancient Persia. Following in Hitler’s footsteps, the current Iranian President is a fanatical dictator who’s agenda is fuelled by a form of anti-Semitism which is expressed through his occult following of hard-line Islamic terrorists.
Ahmadinejad's recent calls to “wipe Israel off the map,” reinforces his ideological motive of mass genocide against innocent people. Optimistically but perhaps only temporarily he lacks the means to achieve his agenda. On the other hand, the current dictatorship may gain the means to commit mass genocide if the West continues to ignore the demands of the Iranian people for a free democratic society.
Those who doubt the possibility of genocide should take a look at the first-hand experiences of pro-Democracy Kurdish guerrillas. The oppressed minority has been fighting with the Islamic dictatorship for decades. Aaron Glantz interviewed two Kurdish guerrillas who spent three months under severe conditions of torture in Iranian captivity. One of the guerrillas recounted his impression of the Iranian justice system:
They told us that we could not have a lawyer because the Islamic Republic itself represents God on this earth. They said you were working against the Islamic Republic. That means you were working against God, so you will be punished by torture.
Words that shock the Western reader, resonate throughout all aspects of the oppressed Iranian society. The oppressive clerical dictatorship has subjugated the lives of millions of pro-western Iranians. Iran suffers from the worst brain drain in the world, has an unemployment rate of close to thirty percent, suffers from one of the worst drug addiction epidemics in the world, and houses one of the world’s largest political prisons.
Iran should be a first world country with its massive oil and gas reserves, rather the average Iranian can barely feed their family much less afford the luxuries of a progressive state. The reigning clerics spend millions funding terrorist organizations like Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and billions buying off their trusted circle that’s loyal to their terrorist cause both inside and outside Iran.
Yes, Iran does have elections. These elections are a facade behind which manipulations of power are concealed. In an article in the National Review Online, pro-Democracy students Bahman Batmanghelidj and Kamal Azari point out that even if seventy percent of the people vote for pro-democracy candidates, “clerical hard-liners ignore the voice of the voters and continue to use their power to veto, repress, and crush even a few modest efforts at a political opening”.
Anyone seeking to run for the presidency of Iran must first be examined by a hard-line group of twelve clerics. During the recent election, the Guardian Council disqualified over ninety-eight percent of the candidates, including all female candidates and virtually every single reformist. The seven candidates that made it past the Council were all Islamists loyal to the Islamic dictatorship. A dictatorship where all authority is vested in an un-elected ‘Supreme Leader’, currently Ayatollah Khamenei.
Hence, although the Iranian government has elections, these elections are used as a propaganda tool directed towards the naïve rather than a tool of democracy . A recent poll conducted by pro-Democracy students in Iran shows that the current President of Iran enjoys the support of about twenty percent of the Iranian populace, likewise over eighty percent of the Iranian student body supports a secular democratic government.
Still, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has disowned the Iranian people’s call for modernization, choosing instead to pursue a policy of irrational fundamentalism that will trigger repercussions around the world. Ahmadinejad is the head of a fascist anti-Semitic campaign, denying the reality of the Holocaust and demanding the transfer of Israel to Europe.
As the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center points out, Ahmadinejad’s statements “reveal him as a fanatic ideologue who despite criticism at home and abroad, clearly prefers revolutionary Islamic considerations, as defined by Khomeini, to pragmatic national ones”.
Some critics believe that the harsh words of the Iranian leader are too emotional to be taken seriously. However, if the majority adopts this approach, it may be too late to suppress the wave of violence. If the violence materializes, it will be felt by the world at large and most importantly by the Persians themselves.
After all, the fundamentalist ideology of the current regime sharply contrasts with the views of young Iranians that desire for a modernized and prosperous state that enjoys friendly relations with the world, without suffering the backlash from economic sanctions. Ahmadinejad’s policies will also exacerbate an already explosive relationship between East and West, perpetuating the dictatorship strategically in a vital region.
The Republican Party’s position of non-violent financial and moral support for the pro-American people of Iran is the best option available to stop these Iranian policies from further damaging the world. President Bush recently reiterated this support when he said that the “United States stands with the people of Iran” and that the “United States has no beef with the people of Iran,” but with the government.
Taking the non-violent approach advocated by the Republican Party can be effective in stopping the nuclear threat like the one averted during the Cold War. Choosing non-violent action will help preserve stability in the region and lead to the peaceful elimination of an oppressive and unjust regime.
Let us take the campaign to the terrorists before we are all pledging allegiance to a regime with the vision of genocide and a universal caliphate state.
iran
Comment
-
President's words scare our community: Iran's Jews
Iran's Jews have sharply criticized President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for
denying the Holocaust, saying his remarks have sparked fears in their ancient but dwindling community.
Ahmadinejad has dismissed the 1933-1945 genocide of six million Jews by the Nazis and their allies as a myth, saying the crime was exaggerated to bolster Israeli interests.
Haroun Yashayaei, the head of Iran's Jewish community, sent a letter of complaint to Ahmadinejad two weeks ago.
"How is it possible to ignore all of the undeniable evidence existing for the exile and massacre of the Jews in Europe during World War Two?" said a copy of Yashayaei's letter faxed to Reuters on Sunday.
"Challenging one of the most obvious and saddening events of 20th-century humanity has created astonishment among the people of the world and spread fear and anxiety among the small Jewish community of Iran," the letter added.
A Jewish community leader said he preferred not to comment on whether Ahmadinejad had sent a reply to the letter, penned on behalf on the entire Jewish community.
Jews occupy an awkward position in Israel's arch-foe Iran, often speaking out against Israeli treatment of Palestinians.
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, spiritual father of Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, urged Iranians to distinguish clearly between their own ancient community and Zionists.
However, Iran's Jewish community has slumped to some 25,000 members from about 85,000 at the time of the revolution. Iran's population is about 69 million.
Iran's Jews are often the subject of intense suspicion and 10 from the southern city of Shiraz were convicted of spying in 2000. The closed door trial sparked international outrage.
The last five detained were released in April 2003.
Last April, Iran's Jewish parliamentarian had to complain to parliament that popular television serials were anti-Semitic. The parliament speaker supported his complaint.
Iran's Jews are sometimes called "Esther's Children." The Jewess Esther, a queen of Persia who gave her name to a book of the Bible, is buried in the Western Iranian city of Hamadan.
iran
Comment
-
فرد هاليدی، استاد روابط بين الملل در دانشکده اقتصاد دانشگاه لندن طی مقاله ای که در سايت اوپن دموکراسی (Open Democracy) به چاپ رسيده، نوشته است که لحن مبارزه طلبانه رئيس جمهور آمريکا عليه ايران بر قدرت محافظه کاران حاکم بر اين کشور می افزايد
وی که از متخصصان مشهور در زمينه ايران و خاورميانه است، اعتقاد دارد که ايران و آمريکا در آستانه بحرانی عظيم قرار دارند و بخش عمده ای از مقاله خود را به ريشه های اين بحران و نحوه شکلگيری آن اختصاص داده که به عقيده وی به کودتای 28 مرداد 1332 و سقوط دولت محمد مصدق در ايران باز می گردد
به نوشته او، اشغال سفارت آمريکا در تهران و گروگان گرفتن دييلماتهای آن به مدت 444 روز، حمايت ايران از گروههای مسلح شيعه لبنانی که باعث خروج ارتش آمريکا از لبنان در سالهای 1983 و 1984 شد، مداخله آمريکا در جنگ ايران و عراق در سال پايانی جنگ که فرد هاليدی آن را طرفداری آمريکا از عراق در جنگ ارزيابی کرده، ظهور و قدرت گرفتن حزب الله در لبنان که به خروج اسرائيل از جنوب اين کشور در سال 2000 انجاميد و سرانجام، وضعيت کنونی آمريکا در عراق عناصری اند که در شکلگيری بحران ميان ايران و آمريکا و وخامت يافتن آن مؤثر بوده اند
فرد هاليدی معتقد است که آمريکا شرايط را در عراق به شيوه ای پيش می برد که ناخواسته راه را برای افتادن اين کشور در دست ايران هموار می کند
غرب آسيا و گستره ای از افغانستان تا لبنان، به عقيده فرد هاليدی، در آينده صحنه جنگ قدرت ميان ايران و آمريکا خواهد بود.
به نوشته فرد هاليدی، ايران به دنبال اين است که در سراسر خاورميانه و آسيای ميانه و همچنين در قبال بحران فلسطينيان و اسرائيل قدرت بلامنازع باشد و می خواهد که از لحاظ هسته ای نيز دست کم همان موقعيتی را داشته باشد که اسرائيل پيش از سال 1994 و آفريقای جنوبی در زمان حکومت سفيدپوستان داشت، يعنی اينکه حتی اگر دارای سلاح هسته ای نباشد، توان توليد آن را در هنگام ضرورت داشته باشد.
بر همين اساس، آقای هاليدی استدلال می کند که نگرانی غرب از برنامه هسته ای ايران ارتباط مستقيم با بحران عراق دارد و هرچه بر نفوذ ايران در عراق افزوده می شود، فشار آمريکا و متحدان غربی اش برای محدود ساختن فعاليت اتمی ايران نيز افزايش می يابد.
به قدرت رسيدن حماس در سرزمينهای فلسطينی و مشکلاتی که آمريکا و نيروهای ناتو در افغانستان با آن درگيرند نيز از نظر فرد هاليدی بر افزايش فشار اتمی بر ايران مؤثر است.
در زمينه به قدرت رسيدن محمود احمدی نژاد و ياران تندروی او در ايران، فرد هاليدی معتقد است که انقلابها پس از يکی دو دهه که از عمرشان گذشت وارد مرحله تازه ای از طغيان می شوند که در آن، عناصر انقلابی به مواضع اوليه خود باز می گردند که از جمله اين مواضع، رويارويی با دنيای خارج است
فرد هاليدی فضايی طغيانزده را در غرب آسيا به تصوير می کشد و از آمريکا انتقاد می کند که با سياستهايی که اتخاذ می کند و با خودداری از اينکه مستقيماً با ايران وارد گفتگو شود، قدمی در راه فروخواباندن چنين طغيانی بر نمی دارد
به نظر او، حکومت جمهوری اسلامی هيچگاه به اندازه شرايط کنونی از ثبات و استحکام برخوردار نبوده است
بهای شصت دلاری هر بشکه نفت و حمايتی عمومی که فرد هاليدی برای محمود احمدی نژاد در ايران قائل است، اين حکومت را از نظر او چه در مقابل مخالفان خارجی همچون سلطنت طلبان و مجاهدين خلق (که وی آنها را اسلامگرايان استالينيست خطاب می کند) و منتقدان داخلی همچون ليبرالها و فعالان حقوق بشر و اصلاح طلبان ضربه ناپذير می کند
او در پايان مقاله اش نتيجه می گيرد که جورج بوش نيز با سخنان مبارزه جويانه ای که عليه حکومت محمود احمدی نژاد ايراد می کند به صف متحدان آقای احمدی نژاد پيوسته است و همه اينها خبر از ماجراهای بيشتری در آينده می دهد
iran
Comment

Comment