I completely disagree with the article for a variety of reasons. First, the article completely neglects the counter-masculine forces in Iranian culture. It depicts Iranian culture as it truly isn't. We must admit that both in current modern Iran and in Iranian culture generally, men do NOT have all the power. There are masculine and counter-masculine forces. Some issues Iran is worse than the West, some better, some equal. Also law isn't power, norms are power. So a law might say men are able to have 5 wives, but norms in Iran greatly condemn this.
About freedom, I'm afraid I don't agree with current popular definitions. Namely, freedom from religion is thought to be freedom. But, many people find their freedom in religion. I don't personally, but I can not deny that some do. Also, secularism is showing itself to be simplistic. All societies that try to be secular backfire and religion gains a strong foothold once again. The point is that religion and politics must be "reconciled" as opposed to become enemies of each other. Only then will religion reform itself and be less oppressive.
Perhaps we could discuss freedom and oppression on a more illustrative case by case basis through examples etc to make the discussion more clear. To stay on topic, perhaps we could discuss spousal abuse. Sure, Islamic interpretation DOES have a negative impact on relationships. My point is that there is ALSO a social and cultural factor, somewhat influenced by our blind love for the west, that is part of the problem.
My conclusion is that we are not only oppressed by religion but also by the West. We have to break out of both.
About freedom, I'm afraid I don't agree with current popular definitions. Namely, freedom from religion is thought to be freedom. But, many people find their freedom in religion. I don't personally, but I can not deny that some do. Also, secularism is showing itself to be simplistic. All societies that try to be secular backfire and religion gains a strong foothold once again. The point is that religion and politics must be "reconciled" as opposed to become enemies of each other. Only then will religion reform itself and be less oppressive.
Perhaps we could discuss freedom and oppression on a more illustrative case by case basis through examples etc to make the discussion more clear. To stay on topic, perhaps we could discuss spousal abuse. Sure, Islamic interpretation DOES have a negative impact on relationships. My point is that there is ALSO a social and cultural factor, somewhat influenced by our blind love for the west, that is part of the problem.
My conclusion is that we are not only oppressed by religion but also by the West. We have to break out of both.

Comment