Cars & Motors News

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rasputin
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2005
    • 63906

    #646
    2005 Bentley Continental GT

    The policeman in his regulation Ford Crown Victoria could not have been more pleasant. Before I could say anything beyond “excuse me officer’ he very gently interrupted by saying “you are looking for the Ritz Carlton which is half a mile back. Turn left at the first set of traffic lights and you’ll be there in no time.”

    He was right of course. Tea at the Ritz Carlton in Half Moon Bay sounded like a very nice way to start a road test, especially if the car happened to be a 160 thousand dollar 195 miles per hour Bentley Continental. If I had any doubts about its presence these were soon dispelled by John, the man in charge of all the valets. There was a long line of cars waiting to unload their passengers and luggage but a bit like the Red Sea, the road majestically opened as I was waved very firmly into pole position. “Welcome to the Ritz Carlton Sir , just leave the keys with us, we’ll take care of the car.” And they did just that. There is a huge car park about 100 yards down the road full of BMWs, Jaguars and other “lesser” makes but when we returned after a very nice cup of Earl Grey tea the Bentley was right there, by the door waiting to whisk us to Monterey a mere 95 miles down the road. When I say waiting it wasn’t a matter of telling someone to get the car, the Bentley was parked just yards from where we left it and in a way this sums it all up. “We know our cars” added one of the valets as he handed over the keys, “believe me, we’ve seen everything from Maybachs to Mazdas, but this one is special”.

    After 300 miles in the-very comfortable driving seat- I realized what he was talking about. The Bentley is not just about money, it is also about taste. While it has presence it cannot, by any stretch of the imagination be called ostentatious. Imposing yes, I am rich, get out of my way aggressive it most certainly is not.

    This is what W.O. Bentley had to say 83 years ago: “while it would offer great comfort and unquestioned luxury as it went about its daily business, so also it would possess a thinly veiled ability to turn into something special at any moment”. Precisely. The 552-bhp 6.0 liter W-12 engine does just that. Highway 1 along the Pacific Ocean is mostly double yellow lines with just the odd passing lane here and there. In the Bentley’s case that was all I needed. Without revving the living daylight out of the engine I simply pressed gently on the loud pedal and in contrast to the message often typed into wing mirrors about other cars maybe be nearer than they appear the opposite was true. Within seconds these were just little specs on the horizon. The car may weigh 5353 pounds but with a 0-60 figure in under 5 seconds passing was no more than a mere formality. Did I get anywhere near its top speed of just under 200 miles per hour? Certainly not. I did, however, get up to 120 miles per hour on a disused airfield. Even at that speed the Bentley was solid as a rock.


    iran

    Comment

    • Rasputin
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2005
      • 63906

      #647
      2006 Lincoln Mark LT 4X4

      SPECIFICATIONS


      MODEL: 2006 Lincoln Mark LT 4X4
      ENGINE: 5.4-liter V8
      HORSEPOWER/TORQUE: 300 hp @ 5,000 rpm/365 lb.-ft. @ 3,750 rpm
      TRANSMISSION: 4-speed automatic
      WHEELBASE: 138.5 in.
      LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT: 223.8 x 78.9 x 73.5 in.
      TIRES: P265/60R18 all-season
      CARGO: 1620 lbs. Maximum payload
      ECONOMY: 14 mpg city/18 mpg highway
      PRICE: $43,605 (includes $850 destination and delivery charge)


      iran

      Comment

      • Rasputin
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2005
        • 63906

        #648
        Toyota's revelation Tuesday that it will develop a new "plug-in hybrid" - which uses a wall socket at night to charge and relies on an electric motor to go many miles before sipping any gasoline - could presage a major shift in automotive technology, some industry analysts say.

        Detroit's Big Three have each said the technology is being looked at - after years of outright dismissal. But Toyota's announcement was more significant because the company is presumed to have the technology to actually bring such cars to market, they say.

        Toyota itself had steadfastly denied any interest in plug-in technology. A senior Toyota engineer told the Monitor early last year the company had little interest.

        But gasoline prices have since soared to more than $3 a gallon. On Tuesday, the president of Toyota's North American subsidiary, Jim Press, said the company is looking at developing a plug-in vehicle that can "travel greater distances without using its gas engine." The technology would "conserve more oil and slice smog and greenhouse gases to nearly imperceptible levels".

        The company is also developing flexible-fuel technology that could use E85 ethanol. If the two technologies were combined in one vehicle, it could help free the US from its oil dependence, some analysts say.

        "When you combine plugging-in - which pushes fuel efficiency over 100 miles per gallon - with biofuels, then you're getting into multiple hundreds of miles per gallon," says Bradley Berman, publisher of hybridcars.com, a technology website. "It starts to look like a real here-and-now solution to oil dependence, air quality, and climate change."

        Not everyone's convinced. Walter McManus, an industry analyst at the University of Michigan, says the technology may be too costly. "I don't think there's a huge market for them," he says.

        But if Toyota's announcement caught some by surprise, it was certainly no surprise to Andy Frank.

        Four years ago, the professor at the University of California at Davis and a team of engineering students created a plug-in vehicle. A typical hybrid has a big gasoline engine and a tiny electric motor. The university students reversed the roles by combining a more powerful electric motor that went 50 miles without using any gasoline.

        No wimpy econo-box, the modified Ford Explorer was a 325 horsepower "rocket" that still got the equivalent of 100-plus miles per gallon even after a tiny gas engine kicked in, says Dr. Frank.

        "The average person who drives 40 miles per day or less wouldn't use any gasoline at all," he says. "The only time would be on weekend trips and vacations across country."

        The impact on America's dependence on foreign oil could be dramatic if such technology were widespread, according to energy-security hawks like former CIA director James Woolsey, who has cited the technology as a key to cutting US reliance on Mideast oil. President Bush also mentioned the technology in his State of the Union speech.

        Frank's studies suggest a major impact on US oil dependence if most vehicles were plug-ins. While an average person might fill the tank with gasoline about 35 times a year, a plug-in would require perhaps six times.

        A great idea? Perhaps. But when offered a detailed look at the machine, each of Detroit's Big Three took a pass, Frank says.

        Toyota, however, accepted his offer. It loaded up the students' plug-in truck and flew it back to the company's research headquarters in Japan. A few weeks later the truck was returned intact, many of its technological secrets well digested.

        Gas prices were probably the biggest factor in changing Toyota's stance. But it also probably helped that Daimler-Chrysler has been delivering its first plug-in hybrid vans to big companies.

        That impetus, plus the other auto companies talking about it, apparently pushed Toyota to go public. After all, it has established a lead in hybrid technology with the Prius - and it wants to remain out in front.

        Another factor might have been the nudge from a group of tech guys working in their garages, modifying a regular Prius into a plug-in vehicle. Such changes voided the warranty, but CalCars founder Felix Kramer says he's pleased if his group has goaded Toyota into making a production plug-in - the group's goal all along.

        "I'm the first consumer-owner of a Prius converted to a plug-in and ... I'm getting at least 100 miles per gallon equivalent. We're still working on better versions, and it's catching on."

        Battery technology remains a challenge. Deep discharges can wear out ordinary and previous-generation batteries. But Mr. Kramer says today's lithium ion batteries are up to the challenge.

        In fact, since proving it could be done by making their own in a garage, after- market conversion companies are now offering to convert regular Priuses into plug-ins for about $10,000 to $12,000.

        Despite some concerns that plugging in might stress the electric grid, or actually increase carbon dioxide emissions by relying on coal-fired power plants, Kramer is not worried. Most charging would be done at night, tapping power at a low-demand time. And because electric power is much more efficient per mile, the amount of pollution and carbon dioxide sent skyward would still be far less than an automobile engine, his analysis shows.

        "What it gives you is the world's cleanest extended-range vehicle," he says. "If Toyota were to begin selling these tomorrow they could sell as many as they could build."

        iran

        Comment

        • Rasputin
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2005
          • 63906

          #649
          2006 Hyundai Accent GLS

          2006 Hyundai Accent GLS

          Base Price $ 13,305
          Price As Tested $ 14,870
          Engine Type dual overhead cam 16-valve inline
          4-cylinder with
          continuously-variable valve timing
          Engine Size 1.6 liters / 97 cu. in.
          Horsepower 110 @ 6000 rpm
          Torque (lb-ft) 106 @ 4500 rpm
          Transmission 4-speed automatic
          Wheelbase / Length 98.4 in. / 168.5 in.
          Curb Weight 2403 lbs.
          Pounds Per Horsepower 21.8
          Fuel Capacity 11.9 gal.
          Fuel Requirement 87 octane unleaded regular gasoline
          Tires P195/55 VR15 Kumho
          Brakes, front/rear vented disc / solid disc,
          ABS and EBD standard
          Suspension, front/rear independent MacPherson strut /
          semi-independent torsion beam axle
          Drivetrain front engine, front-wheel drive

          PERFORMANCE
          EPA Fuel Economy - miles per gallon
          city / highway / observed 28 /36 / 28
          0 to 60 mph est 11 sec

          OPTIONS AND CHARGES
          Premium-Sport Package - includes:
          air conditioning, power heated mirrors, power door locks,
          remote keyless entry with alarm and panic alert,
          15-inch alloy wheels with P195/55R-15 tires $ 1,500
          Carpeted floor mats $ 65
          Destination charge $ included



          iran

          Comment

          • Rasputin
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2005
            • 63906

            #650
            2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara XL-7 EX 4WD

            SPECIFICATIONS
            MODEL: Suzuki Grand Vitara XL-7 EX 4WD
            ENGINE: 2.7-liter V6
            HORSEPOWER/TORQUE: 185 hp @ 6,000 rpm/184 lb.-ft. @ 4,000 rpm
            TRANSMISSION: 5-speed automatic
            WHEELBASE: 110.2 in.
            LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT: 187.4 x 70.1 x 68.5 in.
            TIRES: P235/60R16
            ECONOMY: 17 mpg city/22 mpg highway
            CARGO: 75.1 cu. ft.
            STICKER PRICE: $26,394 (includes $595 destination and handling charge)

            When Suzuki first introduced the Grand Vitara, I thought it was a pretty good compact small SUV. Then the economy-minded Japanese automaker decided to go for a grander image and introduced the Grand Vitara XL-7. This not only added 12.6 inches to the wheelbase and 23 inches in overall length, it also pushed the vehicle into the mid-size SUV segment.

            Now I don’t want to argue with Suzuki or the EPA, but the Grand Vitara isn’t in the same size class as the Ford Explorer or Chevy TrailBlazer, for example. At least it doesn’t feel that way. Those two have wheelbases that are about three inches longer and cargo capacity that’s a lot more as well.


            iran

            Comment

            • Rasputin
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2005
              • 63906

              #651
              2006 Cadillac CTS-V

              2006 Cadillac CTS-V

              I’ve been looking forward to this one. I’m one of those guys who think you can’t have too much horsepower, torque or leather. Where can you use all that power, you might ask? Why worry. We’ll find a way, I say.

              The Cadillac CTS, in my subjective view, can look a bit plain in some colors, and in the lesser trim levels, in spite of Cadillac’s exciting edgy new styling language. That language was first translated into production with this CTS after being previewed by the EVOQ concept roadster at the North American International Auto Show some years ago. With just a touch of added bling this brash design can go from tepid to hot. CTS-V does just that with big, sexy wheels, a shinny mesh grille, a bit of body cladding and those nicely understated ‘V’ badges. I’m sold already.

              Our colleague, John Heilig, calls it a 4-door Corvette. (See his review of the first 2004 CTS-V on TheAutoChannel.com.) There have been a few updates to the car since his report, particularly a modest increase in displacement, torque and price, but not enough to change its character in the least. Displacement is upped from 5.7 to 6.0-litres, torque from 390 to 395 lb-ft and price from 49 grand to 51. I don’t think anyone will notice.

              I slide easily into the black leather seats with suede inserts. A bit more bolster than the standard buckets provide some needed lateral support for those unavoidable times we need to corner a bit aggressively. The relatively short-throw stick shifter pokes invitingly out of the center console. The center stack, steering wheel, and all the interior amenities appear stylish and well designed. While the materials, ergonomics and surfaces are not quite in the same league with the finest Europeans, they are damn close.

              iran

              Comment

              • Rasputin
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2005
                • 63906

                #652
                2006 Jeep Liberty

                2006 Jeep Liberty

                SPECIFICATIONS
                Model: Jeep Liberty 4X4
                Engine: 3.7-liter V6
                Horsepower/Torque: 210 hp @ 5200 rpm/235 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm
                Transmission: 4-speed automatic
                Wheelbase: 104.3 in.
                Length x Width x Height: 174.4 x 71.6 x 70.2 in.
                Tires: P235/70 R16 All-terrain
                Cargo volume: 69.0 cu. ft.
                Economy: 17 mpg city/22 mpg highway/17.3 mpg test
                Price: $32,910 (includes $660 destination charge)


                iran

                Comment

                • Rasputin
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 63906

                  #653
                  2006 Mitsubishi Galant GTS

                  SPECIFICATIONS
                  MODEL: Mitsubishi Galant GTS
                  ENGINE: 3.8-liter V6
                  HORSEPOWER/TORQUE: 230 hp @ 5250 rpm/250 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm
                  TRANSMISSION: 4-speed automatic with manual shift
                  WHEELBASE: 108.3 in.
                  LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT: 190.6 x 72.4 x 57.9 in.
                  TIRES: 215/55VR17
                  CARGO VOLUME: 13.3 cu. ft.
                  ECONOMY: 19 mpg city/27 mpg highway/26mpg test
                  PRICE: $26,499 (base, add $595 delivery charge)

                  Mitsubishi redesigned the Galant a few years back and the redesign only serves to make an attractive car more attractive, in all senses of the word.

                  Galant is a mid-size car that competes with the Honda Accord, Nissan Altima and Toyota Camry. Price-wise, it's in the same ballpark as the V6-powered versions of the others. But it's 3.8-liter V6 is rated at 230 hp, while the Camry's 3.3-literV6 is rated at 210 hp. This isn't going to make a big difference in normal driving, but it might if you have a critical need for power when you enter a highway from an entry ramp.


                  iran

                  Comment

                  • Rasputin
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2005
                    • 63906

                    #654
                    2006 Mazda5

                    Who is it for? Well, after living with it a bit, I’d say it’s for youngsters, oldsters and many inbetweeners. The sporty, modern styling will certainly appeal to youngsters while the utility and the remarkably easy ingress and egress will appeal to the retired set. The compact size, good mileage and 6-passenger format might appeal to anyone. The slick sliding rear doors that open easily and close themselves will appeal, I think, to all of the above categories of potential customers.

                    One of my favorite aspects of the Mazda 5 is the driving position. It is an easy step directly into the roomy driver’s seat. Not up. Not down. Not constrained in any way. The standard tilt and telescopic steering wheel adjusts in both directions with more range than most. Extended all the way out and most of the way down it fit me perfectly. Seated mostly upright in the fabric bucket driver’s seat the steering wheel and other controls felt perfectly natural. The dash-mounted shifter is in easy reach and the audio and cruise controls on the steering wheel are well thought out. Materials, while not luxury-class, are of good quality, well designed and well put together.

                    Powered by a 2.3-litre, dual overhead cam, 16-valve inline four-banger the Mazda 5 was plenty quick. Variable valve timing and variable induction keep it efficient and dual balance shafts keep it smooth. It comes standard with a 5-speed manual gearbox but our test vehicle was equipped with the 4-speed automatic with manual shift mode. Shifts in the manual mode were leisurely at best. I wouldn’t use it necessarily for a sportier feel rather to keep the revs up for better performance. The 157 horsepower and 148 lb-ft of torque were plenty for most purposes but it runs out of grunt quickly if we don’t keep the revs up. A turbo on that engine might be nice. The EPA estimates about 22 mpg around town and 27 on the highway for the manual transmission and just 1 mpg less at each end for the automatic. With a 15.9-gallon fuel tank the cruising range is admirable.


                    iran

                    Comment

                    • Rasputin
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 63906

                      #655
                      2007 Jaguar XK

                      2007 Jaguar XK

                      The XK is not just a new car, it is also an image builder. You may have seen the controversial “gorgeous” campaign featuring some beautiful girls with a few macho men thrown in for good measure. Shot in a French chateau and on a beach just outside Saint Tropez it features people in situations one would normally associate with Ferraris or Lambos. A brave move for a car costing one third of the 430. Love it or hate it, you will certainly remember it. The company is desperately and understandably trying to get away from the brand’s “old man’s car image”.

                      If anything will do it, it is the XK. First of all it does look great, particularly in British Racing Green.

                      It is also a very easy car to drive. There is no fiddling for knobs or buttons a la BMW 7 series, you just jump in, press the red start button , pop it into “D” and you are off. There are some perfectly placed paddles under the steering wheel for those-like me- who like to drive as opposed to just get from A to B. These work magnificently, certainly as well as in the Ferrari 430.

                      The only disappointment in that respect was that when you floored the throttle the 300 horses were adequate rather than outstanding.

                      Relief, however, is at hand as the 420 horsepower version will be unveiled at the LA show in late November.

                      If Jaguar can keep the price down to around 90 thousand dollars then it will be a very attractive proposition indeed.

                      Don’t get me wrong, a 300 horsepower sports car/GT is fine for most people but if Jaguar really wants to reach the “gorgeous” people featured in the commercials they will expect 420. After all the company is presumably after what are known in the trade as conquest sales, in other words persuading people to give up their BMWs, Porsches and Mercedes 500SL-s. No easy task as I am sure Jaguar will be the first to admit.


                      iran

                      Comment

                      • Rasputin
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2005
                        • 63906

                        #656
                        2006 Mitsubishi Outlander SE

                        MODEL: Mitsubishi Outlander SE
                        ENGINE: 2.4-liter DOHC I4
                        HORSEPOWER/TORQUE: 160 hp @ 5750 rpm/162 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm
                        TRANSMISSION: 4-speed automatic with Sportronic
                        WHEELBASE: 103.3 in.
                        LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT: 179.0 x 70.1 x 66.3 in.
                        TIRES: P215/55R17
                        CARGO VOLUME: 60.3 cu. ft.
                        ECONOMY: 21 mpg city/36 mpg highway
                        PRICE: $25,000 (est.)


                        iran

                        Comment

                        • Rasputin
                          Senior Member
                          • Jan 2005
                          • 63906

                          #657
                          2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara

                          2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara

                          The name Suzuki, for me, brings to mind ring-ding-ding motorcycles and tiny, tinny cars. A week with the Grand Vitara has convinced me that Suzuki is a fully modern competitor in today’s automotive scene.

                          From making weaving looms in the 1920s and motor bikes in the 50s, Suzuki built its first automobile in 1955, a stubbly, cartoonesque little thing with rack and pinion steering, tall skinny tires, front-wheel-drive, and independent suspension. Suzuki entered the US market with the Samurai in 1985. And now, in 2005, Suzuki is working on a record sales year.

                          The last Suzuki I drove was a Samurai we rented on the Caribbean island of St. John in the late 80s. It was a competent enough cute-ute, very basic, simple, cheap and plenty fun to drive on those narrow island roads. We had quite an adventure there, trundling to every corner of the island and rescuing a little orange cat named Booker. Remind me to tell you that story sometime.

                          This new Suzuki Grand Vitara came to my driveway unexpectedly. I was scheduled for an Audi. Not a problem. I had seen the new Grand Vitara and was interested in having a closer look. Initial inspection was very favorable. The color took me right away. “Silky silver metallic” they call it and it surely looks silky. I saw the clear beige metallic (gold) at a press event recently and it was just as striking. Certainly the paint and colors are well executed and the finish on my test car was excellent.

                          The Grand Vitara has a sturdy stance at first view. The styling is up-to-date and quite attractive. Suzuki calls it muscular. That’s a bit of hyperbole, I’d say. In fact, I’d still put it in the category called “cute-ute”.

                          lb. The standard Grand Vitara comes quite well equipped. A V6 engine, 5-speed manual transmission, power windows, locks and mirrors, remote entry system, adjustable steering column, steering wheel controls for audio and cruise, three 12-volt power outlets, front and rear automatic climate control, cargo cover, outside temp and fuel consumption gauges, AM/FM/CD/MP3/WMA, XM stereo with 4-speakers and all the airbags you might want. You get all this, in two-wheel-drive configuration, for less than 19-grand. Four-wheel-drive adds $2,200. Premium, sport and luxury packages could bring the price as high as $24,399 with everything. Our test vehicle is has the premium package and lists out at $22,600.


                          iran

                          Comment

                          • Rasputin
                            Senior Member
                            • Jan 2005
                            • 63906

                            #658
                            2006 Dodge Magnum SRT

                            2006 Dodge Magnum SRT

                            I have to make a confession-the new Dodge Magnum SRT8 is not my cup of tea. Having said that it is wonderful news that in its various guises the truly dramatic looking car enabled Chrysler to make a profit after years of languishing in a sea of red ink. Clearly something new and exciting was called for and the company surprised all of us with a really aggressive looking automobile which has been getting awards from all and sundry. Why is it not for me? Well, put it down to old age if you like but I don’t need a 6.1 liter hemi engine. Yes, I can control it, there were no spins or spills but the power did come in rather suddenly and it did call for a great deal of concentration.

                            I see this as a great car for young Texans blasting to a rodeo but genteel Marin County is not like that. Percentage wise there are more Priuses here than anywhere else in the country and that probably says it all. Don’t get me wrong-the Dodge is amazing value at around 40 thousand dollars. It is a bit of an International cocktail-the engine is made in Mexico, the transmission in Germany and final assembly is in Ontario, Canada.

                            Still, what matters is that the Dodge is very well screwed together. The instrumentation is excellent as are the seats. What I missed was the brilliant TV monitor - aiding reversing- from the Infiniti. The Magnum is a long car and the TV would be a God-send.

                            The Dodge has all the standard equipment one could reasonably expect from a 60 thousand dollar automobile and as I’ve said huge fun and huge value for the right person. Having said that I am not that person. I am delighted they are doing well but as we all know the other half of the company is Mercedes Benz. For me an E series 320 with 4matic is the answer to my prayers. Until and if the new S class had a 4matic option as well.

                            For the record the Magnum does 14 to a gallon in town and 20 on the highway, although the chances are that the sort of speeds this Dodge is capable of will tempt people to put pedal to the metal and really go for it.

                            It is as subtle as a Sherman tank and if that is your cup of tea you’ll have lots and lots of fun, not to mention the speeding tickets. Not your Mother-in-Law’s car, that is for sure!


                            iran

                            Comment

                            • Rasputin
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2005
                              • 63906

                              #659
                              2006 Infiniti G35x

                              2006 Infiniti G35x

                              Last week we evaluated the Infiniti M35x all-wheel-drive luxury sedan. This week its sibling the G35x graced our driveway and entertained us on the road. We found the similarities we had expected but found some rather unexpected differences as well.

                              First of all let me explain that they are not different versions of the same car, as I had expected. The ‘M’ sedan is billed by Infiniti as a premium performance sedan and the ‘G’ is called a premium performance sport sedan. Both are rear-wheel-drive with an all-wheel-drive option and both are luxurious and competent. Both have that wonderful 3.5-liter V6 named by Ward’s AutoWorld as one of the world’s 10 best engines. The ‘G’, however, is a tad smaller than the ‘M’ and with sportier suspension settings.

                              Inside a couple of differences are immediately apparent. While the ‘G’ has a keyless ignition it works differently than the ‘M’. The latter is a push button on the dash and one must have a foot firmly on the brake pedal to start the car. The ‘G’ on the other hand has a twisting switch that has a little gate which is too small for the fob and must be turned about 60-degrees to start, much like a traditional switch, but without a key inserted. In the ‘G’s case we needn’t have a foot planted on the brake, which I thought was superfluous in the ‘M’ anyway.


                              iran

                              Comment

                              • Rasputin
                                Senior Member
                                • Jan 2005
                                • 63906

                                #660
                                2006 Range Rover HSE

                                2006 Range Rover HSE

                                SPECIFICATIONS

                                MODEL: Range Rover Sport HSE
                                ENGINE: 4.4-liter V8
                                HORSEPOWER/TORQUE: 300 hp @ 5500 rpm/315 lb.-ft. @ 4000 rpm
                                TRANSMISSION: 6-speed automatic with manual shift mode
                                WHEELBASE: 108.0 in.
                                LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT: 188.5 x 85.4 x 71.5 in.
                                TIRES: P225/50YR19
                                CARGO VOLUME: 71.0 cu. ft.
                                ECONOMY: 14 mpg city/19 mpg highway/14.2 mpg test
                                PRICE: $63,550 (includes $715 inland transportation charge)


                                iran

                                Comment

                                Working...