M Ahmadinejad

[mike435]

good ahamagi nejad va goroohesh ghalat mikonan pa to amrica bezaran

[Rasputin]

محمود احمدينژاد رئيس جمهوری ايران برای شرکت در ضيافت شامی که جرج بوش رئيس جمهور آمريکا امشب به افتخار حضور سران کشورهای جهان برگزار ميکند، دعوتی دريافت نکرده است. يک مقام آمريکايی در اين مورد ميگويد در حالی که تمامی سياستمداران ارشد حاضر در نيويورک به اين ضيافت دعوت شدهاند قطعا رييس جمهوری ايران غايب مراسم خواهد بود، چرا که وی اصولا به اين ضيافت شبانه دعوت نشده است!
به گزارش روزنامه آمريکايی ديترويت فری پرس رفتار توهين آمير و غير متعارف دولت آمريکا در خودداری از دعوت رئيس جمهور ايران به اين مراسم در حالی صورت گرفته است که کاخ سفيد پيش از اين نيز نارضايتی خود را نسبت به اينکه سخنرانی روسای جمهوری دو کشور (عليرغم چند ساعت اختلاف) در يک روز صورت ميگيرد، ابراز کرده بود. گفته ميشود مقامهای آمريکايی همچنان تلاش ميکنند تا به منظور جلوگيری از رويارويی دو رئيس جمهور سخنرانی احمدينژاد را به آخر هفته موکول کنند.

در ادامه اين گزارش با اشاره به اينکه احمدينژاد طبق گفته خود درصدد است در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل دعوت خود را از بوش برای مناظره مجددا تکرار کند، آمده است که کاخ سفيد در حال تلاش است تا مانع از به وقوع پيوستن چنين امری شود.

[Rasputin]

[Rasputin]

[Rasputin]

Williams: Excellent. You are on the cover of Time magazine here in the United States and around the world. Inside, it says, "A Date with a Dangerous Mind." Why do you think they think you have a dangerous mind? Do you?

Ahmadinejad: You should hear what I have to say, and then be the judge of that. I think that if people have a hard time accepting the logic and fact, they should not actually accuse others. The picture is an attempt to darken my face a lot. I think it actually shows me much younger than what I am. The first page, the cover.

Williams: Oh, the cover?

Ahmadinejad: This one? The cover page. Oh, it's really…

Williams: You approve?

Ahmadinejad: …questionable. It's darkened me. And also much — it looks much younger than what I am.

Williams: The question on the cover is what war with Iran would look like. How do you think the discussion has been allowed to get that far, that we're discussing possible war between the U.S. and Iran?

Ahmadinejad: I think we need to ask this question from American — U.S. — politician. But please, let's accept that these questions are raised by only a group of politicians here. But do you really think that the document, the passage shows on this select group of 60 and their goal? I think they're very wrong in what they're doing. They're not moving forward with the developments around the world. The world has changed. Nations have — are awakened now. They want their rights. Equal rights. And fair one. The time for world empires has ended. The U.S. government thinks that it's still the period after World War II. That when they came out as a victor. And enjoyed special rights. And can rule therefore, over the rest of the world. I explicitly say that I am against the policies chosen by the U.S. government to run the world. Because these policies are moving the world towards war. I think that we need to resort to logic, not war. Why should we speak of war? What has happened? What's happened is that the Iranian nation wants to stand on it's feet. It doesn't want to be dependent. It wants to have it's own technology. It wants to develop. Why the U.S. government so against our people? They speak of war so easily, as if it's on their daily agenda. We never speak of war.

Williams: Because…

Ahmadinejad: We speak of peace, equality, rationality.

Williams: The fear of our President is that a nuclear weapon is on Iran's agenda.

Ahmadinejad: I've said before, he's not afraid of a nuclear weapon. There already is nuclear weapon in our region, held by groups, supported by the U.S. government. Is there discrimination here? Are we having a selective approach? We don't need weapons at all. We're strong enough to defend ourselves. And we support peace. And we support equality. We do not want to rule over other people's land. When repeated IAA reports indicate that there has been no deviation in Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology, then why should the U.S. government be so fearful? We think that the world is afraid of the policies being pursued by the U.S. government. Because they won't accept any at all. They're not a party to the MPT either. Why not? Well, why don't they sign the MPT? Why don't they destroy the nuclear arsenal they have? And then the world will be free. We abide by the regulations of the MPT. And we must remain transparent with our people and honest with our people.

Williams: There is something you said that upset and scared a lot of people. It upset a lot of Jews in the United States and around the world when you called the Holocaust a myth. There are people, some people I know who escaped Hitler's reign. There is research. There are scholars who can teach you about it. And yet, you've expressed doubt about the Holocaust. Why?

Ahmadinejad: I've answered three of your questions on this. You know that I belong to the university. I'm an academician by nature. I'm interested in having a scientific approach to all events. But we've chosen three questions. The first question was: In the first World War, over 60 — In the second World War, over 60 million people lost their lives. They were all human beings. Why is it that only a select group of those who were killed have become so prominent and important?

Williams: Because of the difference humankind draws between warfare and genocide.

Ahmadinejad: Do you think that the 60 million who lost their lives were all at the result of warfare alone? There were two million that were part of the military at the time, perhaps altogether, 50 million civilians with no roles in the war — Christians, Muslims. They were all killed. The second and more important question that I raised was, if this event happened, and if it is a historical event, then we should allow everyone to research it and study it. The more research and studies are done, the more we can become aware of the realities that happened. We still leave open to further studies absolute knowledge of science or math. Historical events are always subject to revisions, and reviews and studies. We're still revising our thoughts about what happened over thousands of years ago. Why is it that those who ask questions are persecuted? Why is every word so sensitivity or such prohibition on further studies on the subject? Where as we can openly question God, the prophet, concepts such as freedom and democracy? And the third question that I raised in this regard: if this happened, where did it happen? Did the Palestinian people have anything to do with it? Why should the Palestinians pay for it now? Five million displaced Palestinian people is what I'm talking about. Over 60 years of living under threat. Losing the lives of thousands of dear ones. And homes that are destroyed on a daily basis over people's heads. You might argue that the Jews have the right to have a government. We're not against that. But where? At a place where their people were — several people will vote for them, and where they can govern.

Williams: Yes, but…

Ahmadinejad: Not at the cost of displacing a whole nation. And occupying the whole territory.

Williams: Is that a change in your position that Israel should be wiped away? And second, would you ever be willing to sit down with Jews, with scholars, with survivors of Hitler's camps where six million died? Our American film director Stephen Spielberg is one of many collecting the stories of those still alive, who will tell you of the dead, and the program to kill the Jews in Germany and elsewhere.

Ahmadinejad: I feel as there is a feeling a feeling of a need to get the truth here. Among American politicians as well as some media here. The main question is if this happened in Europe, what is the fault of the Palestinian people? This is a problem we have today, the root cause of many of our problems, not what happened 60 years ago. The Palestinian people are — their lives are being destroyed today. There's a pretext of the Holocaust. Lands have been occupied, usurped. What is their fault? What are they to be blamed for? Are they not human beings? Do they have no rights? What role did they play in the Holocaust? Some attempt to sort of change the subject. From the first day I said, "Well, assuming that the Holocaust happened..." Then again, what does it have to do with the Palestinian people? Not at all. Nothing. Believe me, Palestinian people are human beings. They have feelings. They like to live in their own land, to have the right to self determination, to feel secure in their homes. So that small kids are not killed. So that women are not taken from their own homes, taken from their own home. What is the future of such measures?

[Rasputin]

Williams: If I was President Bush, sitting here across from you, what would you say to him? President to President, but more important, man to man?

Ahmadinejad: It would be really good if you were, actually here, instead of, I mean, replacing Mr. Bush. I think that the situation would have been better here, if you were Mr. Bush. I sent him a letter.

Williams: I'm aware of it.

Ahmadinejad: I raised some very serious issues. I really expressed my thoughts and beliefs. You know that I am teacher. I am interested in talks and in dialogue. I like to understand the truth. Facts. And in that letter, I raised very important subject. I invited him to peace, brotherhood and friendship. But we did not receive an answer. Do you think that I should say anything besides the things that I mentioned there? I, as man to another man, I would say, "We can truly love people. Human beings, all of them. Not a particular party, group or faction alone. Not a special investor or shareholder alone. Everyone. Believe me, children in Africa are human beings, too. They like to have peace, live in peace and live in comfort. They love their parents. And their parents love their children, wherever they live. But they see their children's lives being destroyed in front of their eyes. Because of poverty. While they live on wealth — their lands are very wealthy and resourceful.

Williams: And you talk about children. You and I are both fathers. Recently in your country, thousands of people have signed up to be part of suicide brigades. How would you feel if your own children chose to do such a thing?

Ahmadinejad: Well, what is your feeling about that? Think if America is attacked. What would you like your son to do? Do you want him to defend America or not? I think you would like your son to defend America. It's the same with our son. When you don't have arms, when you don't have power, what can you do? You will sacrifice yourself for your country. It's not a bad thing. Although we are against war. We hate it. The war was imposed on the Middle East. Just look at the scene. About 10,000 kilometers, you look around us. There are hundreds of forces and troops, hundreds of thousands of troops around us. Under the pretext of freedom and democracy. They don't value the people of the region. The people of the region know how to run their own affairs. It's regretful. This coming from a group that supported Saddam for eight years. Saddam was the biggest dictator in our region. Even today, they support countries that have had no elections whatsoever. But still they speak of creating democracy through war. Especially coming from outside. It's impossible to achieve.

Williams: Isn't the world a safer place without Saddam?

Ahmadinejad: It could have been. If you look at Iraq today, everybody was happy was Saddam was overthrown. People thought that the occupying forces would hand over the affairs of the country immediately to the people — at least as soon as possible. Not only did they not leave, but they also said that they plan to stay. They are building huge military bases, to stay. Since the overthrow of Saddam to this day, hundreds of thousands of civilians have been killed there. We think that this goes against the very rules of security. You know, we're very close with the people in Iraq. Many of our people are families and extended relatives. There have been a lot of inter-marriages. There's the deep relationship on an emotional level between our people and theirs. Even Saddam's war against Iran did nothing to damage these old ties. Because we've lived together for thousands of years. The entire Iranian nation sympathizes with every Iraqi individual that suffers as a result of the occupation. Whereas we know that according to international law, creating safety and security is the responsibility of the occupying force. Iraqi authorities say that many of the tensions and the insecurity in the country is as a result of the occupation and occupying forces. Why should this be the case? It could have been much better. Saddam's removal could have been a very good beginning for the American government. To strengthen it's friendship ties with the nations of the region. Everybody was happy in the beginning. But today, the conditions in the region have changed. Anti-American sentiment, hatred towards the American government has increased on a daily basis. Why is this the case?

Williams: Hence...

Ahmadinejad: It could have been different.

Williams: Hence...

Ahmadinejad: We are not happy with what we see there.

Williams: Some of the fighters are trained and funded by your country, shooting at the American soldiers.

Ahmadinejad: This is the claim the U.S. government makes. But there's no evidence. Security in Iraq has the worst impact on Iran. Because we're neighbors. We have very close ties with Iraqi government and Iraqi people. We like to see a powerful Iraqi government. A powerful and secure government in Iraq will benefit Iran. And will benefit the entire region. Because the government, the parliament, the people of Iraq all have close relations with our nation. They're our friends.

Williams: And yet, I have stood on the helmets of Iranian soldiers, which are now used as pavement on Saddam's old parade grounds. I think that also speaks to the bitterness on and off, over the years between the two nations.

Ahmadinejad: Undoubtedly, Saddam hated us. But not the Iraqi people. Millions of people from Iran travel to Iraq on a yearly basis. Kurd, Sunni and Shias were all friends. The Iraqi president is an old friend of mine. The head of the state, the prime minister, is a very close friend of mine, too. And the head of their parliament, the parliament speaker, is a good friend of mine, too. So, we're friends.

Williams: Thank you.

[Rasputin]

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has accused the US and UK of using the UN Security Council for their own ends.
In a speech to the UN General Assembly, he accused the two of being prosecutor, judge and jury whenever they have a difference with another country.

But they use their privileged position whenever the international body tries to hold them to account, he said.

The US and Britain are two of the five permanent members of the security council with the power of veto.

The others are France, China and Russia.

International law

In his speech, Mr Ahmadinejad defended Iran's nuclear programme, which he again said was peaceful.

He contrasted this with the possession and past use of nuclear weapons by countries criticising Iran.

All our nuclear activities are transparent, peaceful, and under the watchful eyes of the IAEA inspectors

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

"Some of them have abused nuclear technology for non-peaceful ends, including the production of nuclear bombs, and some even have a bleak record of using them against humanity," he said.

He described his own country's nuclear activities as "transparent, peaceful and under the watchful eyes" of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Turning to the US and Britain, he asked: "Which of the organs of the UN can hold them to account?

"Can a council in which they are privileged members address their violations? Has this ever happened?"

Mr Ahmadinejad has said Tehran will not yield to international pressure to suspend its uranium enrichment programme.

Darfur conflict

Earlier, the UN General Assembly gathering of world leaders heard forceful calls for action to end violence in Sudan's Darfur region.

US President George W Bush warned that the credibility of the UN was at stake and announced the appointment of a special American envoy to help in the efforts.

President Jacques Chirac of France warned that a crime against humanity was being prepared in Darfur.

The Sudanese government has so far refused to allow UN peacekeepers into the country.

In his address, Mr Bush defended his policies on the Middle East.

He said democracy was gaining ground in the region and terrorists were being marginalised.

The meeting was opened by the outgoing Secretary General, Kofi Annan.

He said he was proud of the role of the UN in ending wars, but there were still far too many people exposed to conflicts.

[Rasputin]

[Rasputin]

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was sharply critical of the United States and Britain in his address before the UN General Assembly on Tuesday, accusing the two nations of using the Security Council only to advance their own interests.

"The question needs to be asked: if the governments of the United States or the United Kingdom, who are permanent members of the Security Council, commit aggression, occupation and violation of international law, which of the UN organs can take them into account?" he asked when he took the world stage at the Assembly, hours after U.S. President George Bush.

"If they have differences with a nation or state, they drag it to the Security Council and as claimants, arrogate to themselves simultaneously the roes of prosecutor, judge and executioner," he added. "Is this a just order?"

The United States and Britain are two of the five permanent members of the security council, with power of veto, as well as France, China and Russia.

Ahmadinejad also reiterated his nation's commitment to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty amid persistent accusations that it is seeking to develop atomic weapons.

Ahmadinejad and his American counterpart have been at odds over Iran's nuclear ambitions -- heightened by the Iranian leader's refusal to adhere to an Aug. 31 UN deadline calling for his country to halt its uranium enrichment program.

The Iranian leader has said repeatedly that Tehran will not yield to international pressure to suspend its uranium enrichment program.

Ahmadinejad also had harsh words about U.S. efforts in Iraq, saying "the occupiers are incapable of establishing security in Iraq" and that hundreds of people are killed "in cold blood" ever day.

He also claimed that several terrorists taken into custody by the Iraqi government were "let loose under various pretexts by the occupiers."

"It seems that intensification of hostilities and terrorism serves as a pretext for the continued presence of foreign forces in Iraq," he said.

Bush warns Iran

Hours earlier, Bush stood at the same podium, warning the Iranian government to abandon its nuclear weapons program.

"Your rulers have chosen to deny you liberty and to use your nation's resources to front terrorism, fuel extremism and pursue nuclear weapons," said Bush. "Iran must abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions."

"We're working toward a diplomatic solution to this crisis and as we do we look toward the day when you can live in freedom and America and Iran can be good friends and close partners in the cause for peace."

Ahmadinejad had challenged the U.S. president to a debate over world issues, but Bush said he has no plans to do so.


"No, I'm not going to meet with him. I have made it clear to the Iranian regime that we will sit down with the Iranians once they verifiably suspend their enrichment program, and I meant what I said," Bush told reporters on Friday.

Open to Iranian sanctions, the U.S. position has become a tough sell for Bush with French President Jacques Chirac arguing against the move.

Chirac said Monday that that the international community should suspend the threat of sanctions on Iran if they agree to hold their enrichment program and return to the negotiating table.

But Bush kept the pressure on Iran, including the possibility of sanctions, after a morning meeting Tuesday with Chirac.

"Should they continue to stall,'' Bush said of the Iranian leaders, "we will then discuss the consequences of their stalling.''

Shireen T. Hunter, a fellow at Georgetown University's Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, told CTV Newsnet that the Americans are sitting on the fence for now.

"They really haven't yet made up their mind whether they want to try diplomacy or if they want to push for sanctions," said Hunter.

"If the European efforts work they might try diplomacy, if not then they're going to push for sanctions."

Bush's vision for the Middle East

Bush also outlined his vision for democracy in the Middle East.

"This morning I want to speak about the more hopeful world that is within our reach, a world beyond terror where ordinary men and women are free to determine their own destiny," Bush told the assembly. "(A world) where the voices of moderation are in power, where the extremists are marginalized by the peaceful majority."

Bush also tailored his speech directly to people living in the Middle East -- attempting to debunk "propaganda" spread about the West.

"My country desires peace," he said. "The extremists in your midst spread propaganda claiming that the West is engaged in the war against Islam. This propaganda is false and its purpose is to confuse you and justify acts of terror.

He also described how moderate governments are more in sync with the UN charter and its declaration of human rights.

"The nations gathered in this chamber must make a choice as well: Will we support the moderates and reformers working for change across the Middle East or will we yield the future to the terrorists and extremists?"

On religion, Bush spoke of his respect for Islam before criticizing Muslim extremists.

"We respect Islam but we will protect our people from those who pervert Islam to sow death and destruction," he said.

On the Mideast conflict

Bush also outlined his position on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"I'm committed to two democratic states -- Israel and Palestine -- living side-by-side in peace and security," he said. "Helping the parties reach this goal is one of the great objectives of my presidency."

Bush then announced that U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice would "lead a diplomatic effort to engage moderate leaders across the region" to assist Palestinians in reforming their security services.

She will also "support Israeli and Palestinian leaders in their efforts to come together to resolve their differences," he said.

Andrew Natsios, former head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, was also announced as a special envoy to Darfur. The appointment comes as a step by the U.S. to end three years of fighting that has killed an estimated 200,000 people.

Speaking directly to the people of Darfur, Bush said: "Your lives and the credibility of the United Nations is at stake."

Bush is wrapping up a string of speeches aimed at stirring up support for the war on terror as the U.S. heads into midterm elections in November.

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan has recently criticized the U.S. invasion of Iraq and has been public about the country's troublesome future.

He said last week that most leaders in the Middle East view the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq as a "disaster."

The remark comes as a reminder of Bush's speech from four years ago where -- in the same room where he spoke Tuesday -- he made his case against Saddam Hussein. It was there that he wrongly accused Iraq of having stockpiles of deadly chemical and biological weapons.

Besides Chirac, Bush is also slated to meet with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and General Assembly President Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa on Tuesday.

[Rasputin]

Ahmadinejad's address to the UN - 9/19/06

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjfhdH7foAw[/ame]

bla bla bla blaaaaaaa

[Rasputin]

[Rasputin]

بيل کلينتون، رئيس جمهور پيشين آمريکا خواهان مذاکره مستقيم ميان ايران و آمريکا شده و در عين حال گفته که درخواست او برای ملاقات با محمود احمدی نژاد، رئيس جمهور ايران رد شده است.
آقای کلينتون با شرکت در برنامه "امروز" (Today) که روز پنجشنبه (بيست ويکم سپتامبر) از شبکه تلويزيونی آمريکايی ان بی سی پخش شد گفته است: "وقتی فکر می کنيد ممکن است با کسی مشکل پيدا کنيد و اين مشکل ممکن است خدای نکرده به رويارويی نظامی بينجامد، بايد پيش از رويارويی، حداکثر تماس ممکن با طرف مقابل برقرار شود".

وی که در ارتباط با مسئله اتمی ايران صحبت می کرد افزود: "ايالات متحده نبايد از گفتگو با کسی ترس داشته باشد، نبايد نسبت به گفتگو ابراز عدم تمايل کند يا شرط و شروط زيادی برای گفتگو بگذارد".

اظهارات بيل کلينتون همزمان با حضور رئيس جمهور ايران در آمريکا ايراد شد و آقای کلينتون در اين برنامه تلويزيونی اشاره کرد که خواهان ملاقات با آقای احمدی نژاد شده اما درخواست او رد شده است.

رئيس جمهور پيشين آمريکا در شرايطی خواهان مذاکره مستقيم ميان ايران و آمريکا می شود که دولت آمريکا چنين مذاکره ای را رد کرده و رئيس جمهور آمريکا پيشنهاد محمود احمدی نژاد برای مناظره تلويزيونی با او را رد کرده و به نامه وی پاسخ نداده است.

بيل کلينتون نيز خاطرنشان کرده که از نظر او عدم تمايل جورج بوش به ملاقات رودررو با محمود احمدی نژاد قابل درک است و تماس با ايرانيها نبايد لزوماً در سطح رئيسان جمهور دو کشور باشد.

آقای کلينتون همچنين در مصاحبه ديگری با او که همزمان از راديوی ملی آمريکا (National Public Radio) پخش شد گفته است: "بر اساس حرفهای دوستان ايرانی ام در آمريکا، من هنوز اعتقاد دارم که اکثريت وسيعی از مردم ايران خواهان روابط خوبی با آمريکا و غربند و نمی خواهند با آمريکا و غرب سرشاخ شوند اما در عين حال معتقدند که وقتی هر کشور ديگری در جهان حق برخورداری از انرژی اتمی دارد، آنها هم بايد داشته باشند، بنابراين ما بايد با توجه به اين خواسته عمل کنيم و اميدوارم بتوانيم راه حل مسالمت آميزی پيدا کنيم".

رئيس جمهور پيشين آمريکا هر ساله همزمان با حضور سران کشورهای جهان در مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد در نيويورک، همايشی با عنوان "طرح جهانی کلينتون" برگزار و از رهبران و شخصيتهای برجسته سياسی و اقتصادی جهان برای شرکت در آن دعوت می کند.

حامد کرزی، رئيس جمهور افغانستان از جمله شرکت کنندگان همايش امسال بود.

[Rasputin]

[Rasputin]

Iranian leader 'not anti-Semite'

Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has said he is not an anti-Semite.
"Jews are respected by everyone, by all human beings," he told a news conference at the United Nations headquarters in New York.

The remarks come months after Mr Ahmadinejad called for Israel to be wiped off the map - and described the Holocaust as "myth".

In response to questions about Iran's controversial nuclear programme, he said the Iranians "do not need a bomb".

The Iranian president's comments on anti-Semitism came during remarks on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

"Some people think if they accuse me of being anti-Jew they can solve the problem.

"No, I am not anti-Jew," he said. "I respect them very much."

"Let us remember that there in Palestine there are Muslims, Christians and Jews who live together," he said.

Later, he added: "We love everyone in the world - Jews, Christians, Muslims, non-Muslims, non-Jews, non-Christians... We are against occupation, aggression, killings and displacing people - otherwise we have no problem with ordinary people."

'Nuclear talks'

The Iranian president said he was "at a loss" in understanding what further guarantees Iran needed to provide to prove its nuclear programme was, as it claims, entirely for civilian purposes.

Iran has failed to meet a UN deadline to suspend the enrichment of uranium.

However, Mr Ahmadinejad said talks with the EU on the issue were "on the right path".

"Hopefully others will not disrupt the work," he said

He said Iran was willing to negotiate on suspending uranium enrichment "under fair and just conditions", but gave no timetable.

Mr Ahmadinejad also accused the US of double standards, asking what it had done to destroy its own nuclear weapons and accusing it of developing new ones.

'Old system'

In comments taking in issues ranging from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Hurricane Katrina, the Iranian president was also critical of the international political system.

He said the current system emanated from a "group of victors who emerged from a world war and are ruling the world".

He said that some members of the UN Security Council sat in judgement of other countries, despite the fact that they were parties to some of the world's conflicts.

He did not specify which countries he was referring to.

In a speech to the UN General Assembly on Wednesday, Mr Ahmadinejad accused the US and UK of using the UN Security Council for their own ends.

He accused the two of being prosecutor, judge and jury in their differences with other countries.

[donsaeid]

رييس جمهوري ايران: يهودي بودن صهيونيستها يك دروغ بزرگ است

رييس جمهوري ايران دركنفرانس خبري درمقر سازمان ملل اظهارداشت:صهيونيست يك حزب و فاقد مذهب است. ممكن است اعضاي ان ادعا كنند كه يهودي هستند اما دروغ ميگويند چون حضرت موسي (ع) مخالف جنگ، اشغال و آواره كردن انسانها بود.


دكتر محمود احمدي نژاد پنجشنبه شب افزود: حضرت موسي (ع) بنياسرائيل را از دست فرعون نجات داد حال پيروان چنين فردي ميتوانند بچه شيرخواره را بكشند و خانهها را ويران كنند و ميليونها انسان را آواره سازند و صهيونيستها يهودي نيستند و اين يك دروغ بزرگ است.

وي بار ديگر بر ضرورت برگزاري همهپرسي در سرزمين فلسطين تاكيد كرد و گفت: صهيونيستها حزب پيچيدهاي هستند كه ميخواهند كنترل دنيا را به دست گيرند.

به عبارتي برخي دولتها ، ميخواهند شش ميليارد انسان روي كره زمين را به يك گروه دو هزار نفره بفروشند.

احمدي نژاد تصريح كرد: ما با قدرتطلبي و كشتار مخالفيم و با صداي بلند اعلام ميكنيم كه هر تجاوزگري از نظر ما محكوم است.

رييس جمهوري در پاسخ به سوالي درخصوص وضعيت زندانيان در ايران گفت: آمريكا ۲۹۰ميليون نفر جمعيت و ۳ميليون نفر زنداني دارد و ايران ۶۸ ميليوني ۱۳۰هزار زنداني دارد كه ۹۰درصد آنان قاچاقچيان مواد مخدر هستند.

وي افزود: اين معادله كاملا شفاف است و همه چيز را نشان ميدهد.

احمدي نژاد در بخش ديگري از سخنانش به استقلال دستگاه قضاييه در ايران اشاره كرد و گفت: دولت ايران يك روزنامه دارد كه نظرات دولت را منعكس ميكند و سه ماه قبل دادگاه اين روزنامه را تعطيل كرد و رييس جمهوري هم كاري نتوانست بكند.

رييس جمهوري همچنين درباره مردم آمريكا گفت: پيام ما روشن است ما همه ملتها را دوست داريم و هيچگاه با ملت آمريكا مشكلي نداشتهايم ، ملت آمريكا مانند بقيه ملتها ، صلح طلب و عدالت طلب است.

رييس جمهوري در پاسخ به سوالي درباره اسرائيل گفت: ما همه را در عالم دوست داريم اما با اشغالگري، كشتار و با آواره كردن ملت مخالفيم ، همه محترم هستند و بايد از حقوق قانوني برخوردار باشند.

وي در پاسخ سوالي درباره علاقه ايران به دريافت ضمانت امنيتي گفت: بحث ما دريافت ضمانت امنيتي نيست چرا كه قادريم از كشور خود دفاع كنيم و هشت سال جنگ اين را نشان داد و اجازه نداديم حتي يك وجب خاكمان از دست برود.

رييس جمهوري افزود: تضمين اجراي تعهدات مهم است. ما با همين آمريكا قرارداد داشتيم اما يك طرفه لغو كرد بايد مطمئن باشيم تعهداتي كه به ما ميدهد با پشتوانه است و تضمين اجرا دارد.

احمدي نژاد گفت: اما در مورد تعليق، گفتهايم كه در شرايط عادلانه مذاكره ميكنيم و در زمان خود اعلام ميكنيم.

وي درباره همكاري ايران و ونزوئلا اظهارداشت: ما علاقهمنديم با همه كشورها رابطه داشته باشيم . ونزوئلا كشور خوب و دولت مستقل است وبايد با هم همكاري داشته باشيم.

رييس جمهوري در پاسخ سوالي درباره تعليق مجددا گفت كه نظرات ما شفاف است . در چارچوب معاهده "ان پي تي" عمل ميكنيم و به دنبال حقوق خودهستيم.

تعليق مشكل را حل نميكند، مشكل در جاي ديگري است ، آنان بايد ديدگاه خود را در برخورد با ملت ايران تغيير دهند.